| 查看: 5121 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
flywood金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
PRL编辑的意见
|
||
|
投了一篇prl，经过快2个月的审稿，审稿人给的意见不适合prl，但是文章值得发表在PRB上。自己感觉这篇文章还是挺新，挺重要的。不知道是否要继续申诉prl，还是直接转投PRB。现在状态还是with authors。大家给点意见。 下面是编辑的回信： The above manuscript has been reviewed by our referees. A critique drawn from the reports appears below. On this basis, we judge that while the work probably warrants publication in some form, it does not meet the Physical Review Letters criteria of impact, innovation, and interest. The paper, with revision as appropriate, might be suitable for publication in Physical Review. If you submit the paper to Physical Review, the editors of that journal will make the decision on publication of the paper, and may seek further review; however, our complete file will be available. If you submit this manuscript or a revision of it to Physical Review, be sure to respond to all referee comments and cite the code number assigned to the paper to facilitate transfer of the records. 审稿状态： CURRENT STATUS OF MANUSCRIPT: With author(s) Copyright/Right to Publish received CORRESPONDENCE: SENT RECEIVED DESCRIPTION 16Nov11 Editorial decision and/or referee comments sent to author 05Oct11 16Nov11 Review request to referee; editor concludes response unlikely 05Oct11 14Nov11 Review request to referee; report received 20Oct11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author 20Oct11 Right to publish signature received 19Oct11 Reminder to referee [others sent (not shown) at 1-2 week intervals] 19Oct11 Reminder to referee [others sent (not shown) at 1-2 week intervals] 05Oct11 18Oct11 Review request to referee; report received 05Oct11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author 28Sep11 Acknowledgment sent to author 27Sep11 Correspondence (miscellaneous) sent to author |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Phys Rev Lett |
» 猜你喜欢
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Appl.Phys.Lett.发表心得
已经有33人回复
- 稿件曲折的经历JAP->JMS->APL->PRL->PRB终于中了
已经有12人回复
- 一篇文章的漫长投稿过程
已经有139人回复
- 有经验的帮忙看看PRL的这封意见如何回复
已经有8人回复
flywood
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1641.6
- 散金: 479
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 847
- 在线: 139.2小时
- 虫号: 119056
- 注册: 2005-11-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的合金相、相变及
|
编辑有给发了这么封信，看来只能转投prb了。 The editors of Physical Review B have examined the records for this manuscript and encourage its transfer from Physical Review Letters to Physical Review B. We will probably seek further review. Please include a summary of the changes made. We look forward to receiving your response soon. |
7楼2011-11-22 12:37:59
匿名
用户注销 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 549 (博士)
- 金币: 18649.1
- 散金: 3666
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 21829
- 在线: 1115.2小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2010-01-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 体育保健学
2楼2011-11-21 16:31:03
匿名
用户注销 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 549 (博士)
- 金币: 18649.1
- 散金: 3666
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 21829
- 在线: 1115.2小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2010-01-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 体育保健学
3楼2011-11-21 16:33:06
匿名
用户注销 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 549 (博士)
- 金币: 18649.1
- 散金: 3666
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 21829
- 在线: 1115.2小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2010-01-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 体育保健学
4楼2011-11-21 16:37:43
20