24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 1109  |  回复: 3

shangqixu

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 新手求助,曲折的稿子

一篇稿子第一次投了Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,修回后直接被拒,当时修改是找的他们的副主编(老板认识)给帮忙修改的,他还说基本上让修改就没问题,结果后来直接据了,第二次又投的Soil and Tillage Research,直接被拒,现在投PEDOSPHERE,审稿意见回来了,要求Reconsidered after major revision ,我已经不敢再改了。。。,下面是两位审稿人的意见,求各位大侠帮帮忙啊。怎么改比较好啊,第二位审稿人表示数据不足,但需要几年前的实验数据,根本没有办法补充实验,补充数据啊。大家教教我该怎么说呢,这次再被拒,我。我。我。。。。
More research is still needed to be conducted in lowland soils (i.e., in rice production). The authors proposed two methods to quantify the SOC stocks. The discrepancy in the results from both methods has been noted, indicating that the overall SOC pool may not be sensitive enough to reflect such changes due to tillage treatments. Alternatively, more sensitive or labile SOC pool(s) is needed. Also, the follow questions should be clarified prior to be considered for publication.

Major Questions:
1.        The differences in SOC stock (Table III, on page 7) between NT and PT at 0-80 cm were 3.7% and 3.3% for FD and EMS, respectively. However, the statistic analysis indicated that the smaller one was significant. How can you explain that? What was the p-value for the ANNOVA?
2.        Using the proposed method, the SOC mass (Table I) of the FD method was around 84 Mg C ha-1 for the background soil. However, the greatest SOC at 0-20 cm in rice production was less than 66 Mg C ha-1. Does it suggest that rice production overall decrease SOC?
3.        The English should be improved for better understanding your studies.
4.        Please provide specific operators for each equation listed.


Minor Questions:
1.        Page 1, Line 7. Changes in tillage practice does not guranteen increase in SOC, even for conservational tillage.
2.        Page 2, Line3 13-18. Please provide reasonable explanation(s) why paddy soils have more SOC than upland soils.
3.        Page 3. Please provide rice cultivar information in the section of experimental design.
4.        Page 3, Line 39. What do you mean SOC of the grains? The organic carbon content?
5.        Page 5, Line 9. Can you read the equation?
6.        Page 12, Line 14. Change ‘effect…’ to ‘Effect…’.


I think the results and conclusions reached by the authors from their investigation are probably correct, but in my experience the results from studies such as this during the first few years may differ somewhat from those measured if the study is continued for a longer period of time. That may not be the case in this situation, but it may be something the authors want to consider. Hopefully this study is still ongoing and measurements continue to be collected.

My only concern regarding the whole manuscript is that no measurements were made of soil C levels before the experimental treatments were applied. It would greatly strengthen the conclusions of the authors if they could show where the soils were at the beginning and where they are after 4 years of these tillage treatments.  There are general results presented for the soil in Table 1, but no results are presented for the 0-80 cm profile. Somewhere in the discussion, it should be mentioned that even though there are apparently significant differences in total soil C after 4 years, there are no initial measurements to compare them to. If nothing else, it would at least be somewhat informational if the authors calculated the amount of soil C from the initial measurements in the 0-20 cm depth and then compared their results after 4 years to that. I don't know that the conclusions would change, but it might provide additional support for those conclusions.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shangqixu

铜虫 (小有名气)

沉得好快啊,没有人给看看么。。。
2楼2011-10-19 13:47:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xingling

新虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖


shangqixu(金币+1): 谢谢,听说进入复审的接受概率都挺大的,哎,我第一次就是复审悲剧,所以现在第二次复审很纠结啊 2011-10-20 09:12:13
shangqixu(金币+1): ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢 2012-03-14 10:03:03
个人一点小建议:提的每个修改建议,你都得认真修改并做好回复,4年前的,只要结论可行,能重现,现在重补也来得急,若实在无法重补实验,你也得回复审稿人,表明:即使不补实验,你的结果并不受到影响等一系列原因。祝您成功
3楼2011-10-19 20:08:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shangqixu

铜虫 (小有名气)

还有没有哪位高手给看下,两位审稿专家都很在意四年前实验结果的对比,但是四年前没有取样到80cm,故无法补充数据,但实验前各处理间数据一致,四年后的差异应该同样说明一些问题。不知道这样修可以不~
4楼2011-10-24 10:16:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 shangqixu 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 22408 312求调剂 +18 门路摸摸 2026-04-14 19/950 2026-04-15 14:23 by 巴塞罗那2015
[考研] 调剂求收留 +34 果然有我 2026-04-10 35/1750 2026-04-15 13:05 by 西北望—风沙
[考研] 材料工程281还有调剂机会吗 +43 xaw. 2026-04-11 44/2200 2026-04-15 12:46 by 西北望—风沙
[考研] 327求调剂 +23 Xxjc1107. 2026-04-13 25/1250 2026-04-14 18:48 by 逍遥三郎
[考研] 085500求调剂材料 +11 易11122 2026-04-09 11/550 2026-04-14 17:59 by lhj2009
[考研] 化工学硕294分,求导师收留 +32 yzyzx 2026-04-12 36/1800 2026-04-14 17:45 by lhj2009
[考研] 335求调剂 +19 想上岸呀!! 2026-04-12 21/1050 2026-04-14 16:23 by Art1977
[考研] 调剂 +12 月@163.com 2026-04-11 12/600 2026-04-14 15:37 by zs92450
[考研] 085408光电信息工程专硕355一志愿长春光机所调剂 +6 王ymaa 2026-04-13 13/650 2026-04-14 11:33 by 王ymaa
[考研] 085404 298分求调剂 +11 呼啦呼啦呼呼呼 2026-04-10 12/600 2026-04-14 08:38 by wfj257
[考研] 一志愿中南大学 0855 机械 286 求调剂 +11 不会吃肉 2026-04-12 11/550 2026-04-13 21:59 by bljnqdcc
[考研] 材料与化工300求调剂 +39 肖开文 2026-04-09 43/2150 2026-04-12 01:30 by 秋豆菜芽
[考研] 化工调剂求导师收留!一志愿失利,踏实肯干,有植物提取科研经历 +20 yzyzx 2026-04-09 21/1050 2026-04-12 00:12 by 小小小小啦啦啦
[考研] 283求调剂 +22 那个噜子 2026-04-09 22/1100 2026-04-11 10:41 by 逆水乘风
[考研] 22408 366分,本科211,一志愿西工大 +4 Rubt 2026-04-09 4/200 2026-04-10 19:51 by chemisry
[考研] 一志愿华东师范生物学326分,求调剂 +8 刘墨墨 2026-04-09 8/400 2026-04-10 12:00 by pengliang8036
[考研] 070300化学 求调剂 +13 73372112 2026-04-08 13/650 2026-04-09 20:22 by maddjdld
[考研] 0703化学求调剂 +21 不知名的小卅 2026-04-08 21/1050 2026-04-09 18:55 by l_paradox
[考研] 332,085601求调剂 +12 ydfyh 2026-04-09 14/700 2026-04-09 17:28 by wp06
[考研] 化学工程与技术专业一志愿哈工程 291分B区 国家级大创负责人 有一作论文 +13 Emmy~ 2026-04-09 13/650 2026-04-09 14:47 by only周
信息提示
请填处理意见