24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2617  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wwspring

银虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 不负责任的主编 + 不负责任的审稿人 申诉纠结中已有11人参与

投了一篇文章,只收到一个貌似具有中国审稿人特质的审稿意见,然后主编二话不说,就根据这一个人的意见拒了我的文章。
无比愤怒!!!!
我该怎么办,要和主编申诉吗?

Dear Prof XXX,

Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they are advising against publication of your work.  Therefore I must reject it.

For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.


Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #2: 1. All of the ? in the text was not normal.
2. In line 120, why 100,350,600 mg/Kg were selected as the three different doses.
3. XXXX was a kind of polysaccharide, which was the main component?
4. The structure of abstract was not standard.
5. The English language of the text should be refined.

The preliminary work should be completed before any revised paper is sent in.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kongjzh

木虫 (正式写手)

算了
改投吧
也许会更好
16楼2011-11-12 16:59:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wwspring 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见