24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 992  |  回复: 3

hyllucy

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 求助,审稿人意见里有段说因子分析的,不知何意

The selection of items for the factor analysis appears to include nine items which are worded to indicate negative outcomes and over 40 items which are worded in a positive way. This is problematic in terms of response set biases especially when the researchers (after the Table 1 insert) then use the high percentage variance accounted for on the factors to suggest highly positive evaluation of Expo. The high percentage variance is a result of a large number of positive items which predictably enough load effectively on the same factor (s). If a smaller number of items had been used the factor’s eigen value would have been less. This does not mean the factor would be less coherent. The mistake here lies in assuming that a high percentage variance accounted for is the same as high importance to the respondents. Perhaps the authors are aware of this issue but clarity in expression is needed to make it transparent.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yexinliang

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
hyllucy: 金币+20 2012-03-21 20:56:09
嘻嘻,有空来我家,我告诉你什么意思~~金币给我吧~~~
2楼2012-03-21 14:26:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hyllucy

新虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4484085楼: Originally posted by yexinliang at 2012-03-21 14:26:05:
嘻嘻,有空来我家,我告诉你什么意思~~金币给我吧~~~

过期无效了
这个问题应该你给我金币才对哦~~~
3楼2012-03-21 20:38:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yexinliang

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
4484923楼: Originally posted by hyllucy at 2012-03-21 20:38:12:
过期无效了
这个问题应该你给我金币才对哦~~~

呵呵,你给我木虫金币,我给你真金币~~~
4楼2012-03-21 20:53:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 hyllucy 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +6 yuleib84 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-31 19:46 by 鱼翔浅底1
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +6 gdd2018 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 08:58 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +15 晴天加油 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-29 18:28 by symmetry
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +11 董八千 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 18:06 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
信息提示
请填处理意见