| 查看: 16726 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
数一英一硕士调剂（双一流高校）
+1/184
-
香港中文大学（深圳）靳羽华教授交叉实验室招募2026年材料学博士生（光致变色）
+2/122
-
合肥工科211水利工程调剂招生
+1/60
-
赣南师范大学智能制造与未来能源学院2026年硕士调剂信息
+1/46
-
广东唯一石化院校——资源与环境专硕招生
+1/42
-
中国计量科学研究院长度量子基准实验室2026年调剂招生
+1/34
-
上海交大招聘高分子方向博士后及科研助理
+1/30
-
汕头大学海洋与生命学科李升康教授团队招收生物类调剂生
+1/23
-
双一流大学湘潭大学“化工过程模拟与强化”国家地方联合工程研究中心招收博士生
+1/17
-
诚挚招生（硕士+博士）
+1/9
-
江西科技师范大学 材料与能源招收调剂研究生
+1/9
-
欢迎各位同学申请参加澳门大学健康科学学院的2026年夏令营，报名截止4月12号
+1/5
-
双非有经验之人求调剂
+1/5
-
福建师范大学国家级人才团队招收2026年博士研究生
+1/4
-
教育部重点实验室招收2026年调剂生，化学、材料、机械、计算机等
+1/4
-
宁波东方理工大学余鹏课题组2026年上海交大联培博士生、博士后、科研助理招聘
+1/3
-
26年招收07 08学术型/专业型硕士研究生
+1/3
-
香港中文大学 生物医学学院/组织工程与再生医学研究所 招聘博士后/研究助理
+1/2
-
欧洲手性光谱方向ROA/CPL/Raman imaging招收博士研究生及联合培养生（布拉格）
+1/1
-
香港大学 化学系 博后招聘
+1/1
40楼2011-06-28 09:29:08
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
