24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2937  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

谦虚阿杜

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,大家帮忙分析下意见~

今年3月24日投了Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,顺利通过了第一轮的技术审查后,苦苦等了将近3个月,今天收到了主编发来的以下消息:
   Dear Mrs. Wang,
     I have now examined your above referenced manuscript and unfortunately cannot accept it for publication in Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

     I regret that we are not able to be of help to you on this occasion, and I thank you for your interest in the Journal.

Yours sincerely,
Simon Braun
Editor in Chief

邮件的最后,还有以下的一段话:
Dear Dr. Wang,

I regret to inform you that your paper has been rejected from MSSP.
Whilst your work appears sound and thorough, it is difficult for me to find a true contribution to the field. I appreciate that your proposed algorithm is a novel method for dealing with vibrating pump data, but it is not clear that this method is superior to any existing methods.  Without reference to an existing "gold standard", it is impossible to evaluate your contribution.

With best wishes

      请问各位大侠,我这篇文章是不是就完全没有希望了?邮件后面的这段话貌似是责任编辑给的意见,然后杂志主编做出了拒稿的决定。文章貌似都没有送出去审稿啊。。。
    这种情况大家有什么建议没有啊 苦等了3个月却等来的是这个。。。。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

谦虚阿杜

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by visitor958 at 2011-06-24 10:57:30:
如果可以与现有方法的对比,结果很好,当然可以试试。

大牛您好!从责任编辑的意见里面,我似乎觉得他还是认为我的文章有新意的,因为责任编辑说“ I appreciate that your proposed algorithm is a novel method for dealing with vibrating pump data”。不知道这句话是不是表达了这个意思?还是只是责编的一句客套话? 能不能帮忙详细分析一下责编的意见?看看我修改完后再投这个杂志希望大不大。 因为我是第一次投国际期刊,没什么经验,所以只能拜托大家来帮忙分析一下了。谢谢!

"Whilst your work appears sound and thorough, it is difficult for me to find a true contribution to the field. I appreciate that your proposed algorithm is a novel method for dealing with vibrating pump data, but it is not clear that this method is superior to any existing methods.  Without reference to an existing "gold standard", it is impossible to evaluate your contribution.”
5楼2011-06-24 19:22:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

dandao2001

铁虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
谦虚阿杜(金币+10): 2011-06-24 05:19:15
yensh(金币-6): 不好意思,楼主操作失误,多发了,代为扣回 2011-06-24 07:31:03
好好修改一下,再投吧。
2楼2011-06-23 23:13:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

谦虚阿杜

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by dandao2001 at 2011-06-23 23:13:01:
好好修改一下,再投吧。

按照编辑的意见,文中似乎是缺少与现有方法的对比。如果我把这部分内容加进去之后,你觉得再投这个杂志希望大么?还是改投其他杂志?谢谢
3楼2011-06-24 05:28:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

引用回帖:
Originally posted by 谦虚阿杜 at 2011-06-24 05:28:58:
按照编辑的意见,文中似乎是缺少与现有方法的对比。如果我把这部分内容加进去之后,你觉得再投这个杂志希望大么?还是改投其他杂志?谢谢

如果可以与现有方法的对比,结果很好,当然可以试试。
4楼2011-06-24 10:57:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见