|
|
【答案】应助回帖
hanlin1122(金币+10, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-06-20 15:24:16
Recently, the Anchorage terminal option has been reconsidered.近来，Anchorage码头选项又被重新考虑。 Usibelli, as part of the Blue Sky team, is investigating the feasibility of off-loading rail cars at the Port of Anchorage and barging coal to the Agrium site. 作为Blue Sky 团队的部分，Usibelli正在研究Anchorage港口轨道车辆卸料并运送到Agrium现场的可行性。This work is in the preliminary stages, and for confidentiality reasons, details are not available at this time. 这一研究工作尚处于初始阶段，为保密原因，细节在此未予披露。To consider this option, therefore, several assumptions were made:因而，为考虑此选项，作了如下几个假设：
1） The rail cost of coal delivered to Anchorage will be $5/tonne (5/9 of the cost to deliver to Seward).运送煤到Anchorage的轨道运输费用将为5＄/吨（运送到Seward费用的5/9）
2）The barge loading rate and cost will be the same as for the Seward terminal.运送的装载速度和费率与Seward码头的相同。
3）The capital cost for the terminal will be absorbed in the loading cost.码头资本成本将被分摊到装载费用中。 |
|
回复此楼