[交流] 帮看看es&t 审稿意见

文章被拒，3个意见，第1个审稿人，拒绝，意见只有2句不痛不痒的话，第2个审稿人，拒绝，意见一般，不过里面的问题基本上都是不重要或者审稿人由于没仔细看文章而下的论断。第3个建议大修，但是对文章的重要性和创新性予以的好评。而且看得出来，这个人对我做的东西比较了解。此外，评审人所有问题都可以比较好的回答或者反驳。
请各位专家帮看看下面这个编辑意见怎么样？个人感觉编辑没完全否定文章：I have concluded that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in ES&T in its current form. I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal.是否有重投的必要性？或是编辑拒绝文章都是这种的口气，即使很烂也是这样拒绝？
意见如下：
Your manuscript was assigned to me for editorial handling by ES&T Editor Dr. Jerald Schnoor. I have received three reviews of your manuscript (attached). As you will see, two of the reviewers noted that the research was quite thorough and included a substantial amount of new information that might be valuable to the research community. However, all three reviewers noted significant shortcomings. In particular, Reviewer 2 indicated that the manuscript lacked novelty and included numerous statements that were not well supported by data. Reviewers 2 and 3 both noted a lack of information on the reproducibility of experiments while Reviewer 1 questioned the relevance of using pure cyanobacteria cultures to gain insight into this problem.

On the basis of these concerns, I have concluded that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in ES&T in its current form. I believe that the findings presented in this manuscript is potentially interesting to researchers studying water treatment and algal blooms and I encourage you to submit it to a journal specializing in that topic. Although this manuscript is not appropriate for publication in ES&T, your interest in publishing your work in ES&T is appreciated. I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal.

[ Last edited by lilei119 on 2011-5-14 at 15:46 ]

回复此楼