24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 6165  |  回复: 23
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

herter

金虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 大家交流下elsevier 的technical 检查,挺郁闷的 已有19人参与

以前投稿基本直接送审,最近elsevier在送审之前来个什么技术检查,直接没送审之前就要我修改英语,接着后面就是什么英语修改的广告什么的?而且一篇$300多,难道elsevier想找理由给非母语的出难题,新的赚钱方式??
欢迎大家讨论,说说最近的情况;
感谢!

Thank you for submitting your work to ****.

Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage).

We regret to inform you that your manuscript has failed in the initial formal technical criteria assessment.

(1) USE OF ENGLISH

In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Authors have the responsibility to present papers in good English which can be understood by the journal's readership. If reviewers cannot understand your work as easily as possible, the acceptance possibility of your article will be lowered greatly.

We will NOT consider a revised version of your manuscript, unless it has received a complete re-writing to improve the level of English.


(2) STRUCTURE AND COMPLETENESS

Your manuscript is NOT in accordance with every aspect listed within the author guidelines. Your manuscript should include, but not be limited to, the comments mentioned below.

1) In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's desired standard. There are a number of grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences. Please check the manuscript and refine the language carefully.




(3) FINAL WORD

If you thoroughly revise your manuscript in accordance with what is stated above in (1) and (2) we welcome you to resubmit it, however, we will again check your manuscript for adherence to technical criteria. Passing this is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the Editor.

Yours sincerely,


////////////


*******************************************************************************************
With ever-increasing standards of excellence in both research and publishing, it is in an author's best interest to make sure his/her paper is in its best possible form when submitted for publication - that includes the quality of the written English, accurate illustrations, adherence to the Guide for Authors, and the presentation of factual, accurate data.

If you have difficulty with the English language or your illustrations, you may consult a professional editing service. There are numerous services available throughout the world.

To find out about Elsevier Language Editing Services please visit; http://webshop.elsevier.com/languageediting/
For Elsevier Illustration Services please visit; http://webshop.elsevier.com/illustrationservices/  

Use of these or any other Language Editing or Illustration Services is not mandatory, and will not guarantee selection for peer review or acceptance for publication in an Elsevier journal or any other publication. For more information please refer to our Terms & Conditions at the link below:

http://elsevier.com/wps/find/ter ... ome/termsconditions
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

herter

金虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
21楼: Originally posted by usthlll at 2013-06-14 13:01:37
我投的carbon,技术审查没过,给的意见一样,不知道具体怎么改,我都找人改了好多次了,估计是得花钱了。

******************************************************************************************* ...

建议别花钱,改投其他杂志;
22楼2013-06-14 14:55:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 24 个回答

herter

金虫 (著名写手)

不知道大家最近投稿elsevier 的情况如何,希望交流讨论对策;
2楼2011-05-07 20:08:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家


nsp27(金币+1): 感谢回帖交流~~~ 2011-05-08 08:50:13
elsevier有的就是麻烦,我们一般改一次,再不行,就换一个杂志(杂志很多)。。。
3楼2011-05-07 20:29:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yonlay

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by herter at 2011-05-07 20:08:38:
不知道大家最近投稿elsevier 的情况如何,希望交流讨论对策;

我投这个旗下的期刊,从来没有进行过技术检查,呵呵。。。可能期刊的要求吧
4楼2011-05-07 20:46:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 我不理解! +19 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 27/1350 2026-09-02 12:08 by Ai19911123
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 16/800 2026-09-02 12:07 by Ai19911123
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +4 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 8/400 2026-09-02 10:35 by 瞬息宇宙
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
信息提示
请填处理意见