24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4786)
>导师招生 (625)
>文献求助 (389)
>休闲灌水 (239)
>硕博家园 (115)
>考博 (106)
>博后之家 (100)
>招聘信息布告栏 (82)
>公派出国 (81)
>虫友互识 (78)
>论文投稿 (60)
>论文道贺祈福 (47)
>海外博后 (43)
>留学生活 (37)
>基金申请 (33)
>考研 (30)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

light7625

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 2290.5
散金: 30
帖子: 251
在线: 88小时
虫号: 579237
注册: 2008-07-04
性别: GG
专业: 电化学

[交流] 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？已有31人参与

编辑的邮件上说：Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.
从这段话里好像也看不出什么吧？

但是奇怪的是审稿人的意见怎么只有一个呢？
Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: This manuscript reports the fabrication process of spherical particles of XXXX and investigated XXXXXXXX. This work sounds to be interesting, but it needs to undergo revisions before the possible publication.
Below are my recommendations:
- According to the content of the manuscript, the title is not suitable and should be revised.
- The peaks of XRD pattern should be indexed.
- Can the nanoparticles of XXXX be prepared by this method? If not, why?

如果只看审稿人的意见好像并没有完全否定我的文章，但怎么会只有一个审稿意见呢？
如果修改，我只要按照这个修改意见做修改呢还是要大改？难道我要完全重写吗？

请高人指点，不胜感激！

回复此楼