24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2243  |  回复: 12
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

footvox

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 拜求大家帮忙看看这个拒稿信???

看了编辑的结论,是拒稿,可以自己选择是修改继续投或者放弃改投其他杂志。大家帮我看看吧,自己不知道该怎么办?
适当拒稿对待还是大修还是修改后重投?重投还是要换一轮的审稿专家么?

From Editor

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of ***. I have now received 3 reviews of your manuscript.

I am sorry to inform you that based on the reviews of your manuscript, I have decided to decline it for publication in Journal of *** at this time. While the manuscript is not acceptable now, with additional work, as outlined in the comments, I believe that you will be able to turn this into a more suitable paper. I am rejecting it now so as not to put a time constraint on your revision and allow you ample time to complete the additional work. Once the revisions are complete, I would like to encourage you to resubmit the paper.

If you resubmit this paper, please note that you will need to send a point-by-point response to all reviewer remarks as well as a "tracked-changes" (changes highlighted or otherwise noted) version of your manuscript. Your revised manuscript will be treated as a new submission.


From report of associated editor

All of the reviewers agree that the paper potentially has some valuable resutls, but also that it has significant problems and needs a lot of work before it is ready to be published. I recommend that the authors be given the chance to revise the manuscript (in agreement with reviewers #2 and #3), and if they do not address the reviewers suggestions satisfactorily or they are unable to address them in a reasonable amount of time, that the paper be rejected and the authors be encouraged to resubmit taking the reviewers suggestions into account. I marked the English editing issue because of comments made by reviewer #1. It might be worthwhile pointing out to the authors that some of the issues are major questions about the overall approach, while others are details that are unclear to the reader, or perhaps were inadvertantly left out.
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

SCI写作、投稿、经验

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

footvox

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by wolfqfy at 2011-04-21 20:15:57:
是据稿!editor觉得给你大修的话,时间不够;所以直接据稿,不过允许你大修后重投,当新manuscript对待。

这种情况的话,你有啥建议么?
8楼2011-04-21 20:19:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答

sculhf

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

断翼天使

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

重新再投
接受的可能性很大
谋事在人成事在天
2楼2011-04-21 19:37:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunyuyan1209

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖


sunke(金币+1): 鼓励回帖交流 2011-04-22 01:24:20
实验数据和结果能补上的话,可以按照审稿人和编辑的意思改,改好后可以再投这个期刊,身边有这样的例子。要是文章不容易改的话,那就改投别的期刊把
3楼2011-04-21 19:43:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

给你机会,或“you will need to send a point-by-point response to all reviewer remarks ”,肯定是修改重投,除非有重要问题没法解决或不想解决。
4楼2011-04-21 19:57:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见