|
|
[交流]
刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见,看不懂,高手帮忙看一下~~
刚收到SCI期刊the computer journal的审稿意见,不知是有机会修回还是被拒了,请高手帮忙分析分析!需要这篇毕业啊,小弟万分感谢!
Associate Editor:
Comments to the Author:
Two of the three referees identify major presentation problems, to the point at which it is not really possible to verify whether what the paper is doing makes sense. Also, the work appears poorly motivated. Even the third (favourable) referee identifies areas which are not completely clear.
This paper might contain publishable material; however, there are major problems with the current formulation. |
» 猜你喜欢
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上)
已经有13人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|