应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 第一次投稿被拒，请有经验的虫们指点一下啊！
51/1返回列表
查看: 2666  |  回复: 11
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xscxscxsc

木虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 第一次投稿被拒，请有经验的虫们指点一下啊！已有11人参与

我是一个半月前投稿到journal of physical chemistry C，昨天收到被拒消息。这是我第一次投稿，一点经验没有，现在很纠结，请大家给点意见是经过认真修改后重新投稿还是修改后改投其它杂志比较好，我现在都博三了，非常着急，审稿意见如下：谢谢大家啦！
Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: This paper is not recommended because it does not provide new physical insights.

Comments:
Review of the manuscript (jp-2011-00693f)
By Wang et al. “Study of interfacial enhancement of carbon nanotube and carbon fiber reinforced composites”.
This manuscript presents the effect of CNTs grafted on a CF on interfacial shear strength. The models were used to estimate the interfacial shear strength of CNTs/CF reinforced composites. The idea is new. However, in this manuscript, there is no highlight result, and the novelty and scientific significance of this manuscript are lacking, and the discussion on why the interfacial shear strength of CNTs/CF reinforced composites is enhanced is superficial. In my opinion, it is not suitable for publication in J. Phys. Chem


Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: This paper is probably publishable, but should be reviewed again in revised form before it is accepted.

Comments:
Review of manuscript jp-2011-00693f

This work is an attempt to probe the reinforcing potential of Carbon Fiber (CF) grafted with carbon nano-tubes (CNTs) using molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. As far as I understand the study is based on previously published data, and on simulations of microdroplet tests.

The issue is definitely of importance and novel, and the theoretical results, as an upper boundary to the reinforcing ability of CNTs grafted fibers, are interesting. On the negative side, however, it seems to me that the authors have only input previously published data into commercial simulation software. Moreover, there is a serious lack of references to a substantial amount of recent experimental results (CNT-grafted on single fibers) published in this field, which are actually fully relevant to the theoretical calculations presented by the authors. The reference list regarding work of the last 10 years about interfacial adhesion between CNTs and polymers is very incomplete as well.

In view of this I cannot recommend publication of the manuscript in its present form.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2011-03-13 06:14:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangdong001
祝福
4楼2011-03-13 10:59:33
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

ch123en123

木虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
祝福楼主再接再厉~\(≧▽≦)/~啦啦啦
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2011-03-13 07:04:38
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

snack

木虫 (著名写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
修改后改投其他刊物吧。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
3楼2011-03-13 10:54:49
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bener

木虫 (正式写手)
★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
猪会飞(金币+3): 鼓励交流 2011-03-13 20:21:29
引用回帖:
Originally posted by xscxscxsc at 2011-03-13 06:14:33:
我是一个半月前投稿到journal of physical chemistry C，昨天收到被拒消息。这是我第一次投稿，一点经验没有，现在很纠结，请大家给点意见是经过认真修改后重新投稿还是修改后改投其它杂志比较好，我现在都博三了 ...

第一个审稿人对你是否定的，第二个应该是大修。两个审稿人的评价均比较负面，lz可以看看第二个审稿人是否合理，还是按照第二个审稿人的意见好好修改再改投其他刊物吧。
赞一下(2人) 回复此楼
笨笨
5楼2011-03-13 11:20:53
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭