| 查看: 1408 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
catsupport木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
这样的审稿意见有机会发表吗？ 已有6人参与
|
||
|
这样的审稿意见有机会在该刊物上发表吗？ Dear xxx Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry. It has been examined by expert reviewers who have concluded that the work is of potential interest to the readership of The Journal of Physical Chemistry; however, it appears that a major revision, possibly followed by further reviewer evaluation, will be needed prior to its further consideration for publication. Please see the enclosed reviewers' reports for details regarding the requested changes and/or additions. We ask that you submit your revision no later than xxx 2011. Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: This paper is probably publishable, but should be reviewed again in revised form before it is accepted. Comments: This manuscript describes fabrication of xxxxxxx. A number of analytical tools have been employed to characterize the fabricated material. Authors have investigated the effect of a wide range of reaction parameters on the evolution of the xx structures, which may warrant the publication of this study in this journal. But before that, authors need to address the following issues: Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: This paper is probably publishable, but should be reviewed again in revised form before it is accepted. Comments: In this manuscript, the authors reported the synthesis of xxxx by a xxxx method. The xxx properties of as-prepared xxxx have been investigated and the results are interesting. This manuscript may be acceptable in this journal after major revision. In particular, the following points should be addressed. 机会有几成？？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
明天应该可查了！？
已经有5人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有7人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有10人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有10人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有24人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有17人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- ACS 这样的修改意见能接受吗？
已经有30人回复
- 发了篇IEEE TAC，审了两篇IEEE TAC和IEEE TSP，说点收获
已经有38人回复
- 什么叫大修？文章大修是不是非得对原论文作大的改动？
已经有25人回复
- 求助审稿意见中Some minor editorial assistance is required是什么意思？
已经有5人回复
- 被一个审稿人提了9条意见，还有戏吗？
已经有40人回复
- 三个审稿意见中有一个不赞成发表，接受的几率大吗？
已经有13人回复
- 大家帮忙看这样的审稿意见还有必要改吗，还是改投别的期刊呀！
已经有23人回复
- 外文期刊谁遇到过这种情况？（欢迎讨论，中了，该帖内散尽金币）
已经有14人回复
- 怎么挽救被拒文章，战胜学霸的刁难？
已经有27人回复
xiaxue_326
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2323.6
- 散金: 61
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 1378
- 在线: 151.6小时
- 虫号: 874394
- 注册: 2009-10-16
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 新型信息器件
5楼2011-03-04 16:42:48
2楼2011-03-04 16:10:08
3楼2011-03-04 16:18:31
科大小鱼儿
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 15747.3
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 3000
- 在线: 194.7小时
- 虫号: 95673
- 注册: 2005-10-06
- 专业: 元素有机化学
4楼2011-03-04 16:21:59
20