| 查看: 2046 | 回复: 11 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
2004500730铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
求助——此份评审意见如何解读？？ 已有9人参与
|
|||
|
投稿《Mechanism and Machine Theory》，编辑转发了审稿人的意见，但标红线处看不明白，究竟是只把其建议的文献加在综述里，还是文章的研究内容要扩展？请指教。 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This reviewer congratulates the authors for the newest effort in the kinematic analysis of complex planar linkages. The idea was based on BKC (basic kinematic chain) developed by Prof. T. L. Yang and his associates. It offers a method for BKC type identification and then a numerical method for the kinematic analysis. They are capable of treating up to 12 links. They are able to find all possible BKC configurations. The following references are suggested, which address the issue of complex linkage configuration "recognition", i.e. motion continuity and smoothness among possible configurations. Ting, K. L., C. Xue, J. Wang, K. Currie, "Full Rotatability and Singularity of Six-Bar and Geared Five-Bar Linkages," Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 2, no. 1, pp. 011011-1~9, March 2010 J. Wang, Ting, K. L., C. Xue, "Discriminant method for the mobility identification of Single Degree-of-freedom double-loop Linkages," Mechanism and Machine Theory, Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 740-755, May 2010 Wang, J. and Ting, K. L. Mobility Identification of a Group of Single Degree-of-freedom Eight-bar Linkages, Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference,DETC2010-28961 Publication is recommended. Reviewer #2: This paper presents a general method for the kinematic configuration analysis to planar closed kinematic chains with R-pairs. This is an interesting topic and examples show that this method is simple, efficient and reliable. So the reviewer tend to recommond the paper be accepted by the journal after a good proofread of the whole manuscrip. [ Last edited by 2004500730 on 2011-2-21 at 15:13 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 机械科研经验专辑 |
» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有19人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有53人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求助:怎么回答评审意见？ unnecessarily complicated，急啊！
已经有5人回复
- 让人无语+困惑的评审意见——求助！
已经有38人回复
- 物理I处的青基评审反馈，求意见
已经有7人回复
- 求指点：国基同行评审意见。
已经有32人回复
- 【求助】您的申请表已经提交,请等待基金委审核. 有谁关于状态解释的信息?
已经有44人回复
- 紧急求助：评审意见中一条意见的意思
已经有4人回复
- 【求助】关于校内评审意见表（申请学费资助人员需提交）的问题
已经有3人回复
- 青基返回5个评审意见，求鉴定
已经有5人回复
- 【求助】广西自然科学基金如何查对自己的评审意见？
已经有7人回复
tibetnamco
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 72 (初中生)
- 金币: 2090
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 38
- 帖子: 801
- 在线: 112.5小时
- 虫号: 796561
- 注册: 2009-06-18
- 专业: 污染物行为过程及其环境效
6楼2011-02-21 16:12:31
2楼2011-02-21 15:18:02
2004500730
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 55.4
- 散金: 30
- 帖子: 94
- 在线: 54.3小时
- 虫号: 719937
- 注册: 2009-03-11
- 专业: 机构学与机器人
4楼2011-02-21 15:24:07
yijie
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5737.8
- 散金: 2895
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 213
- 在线: 502.4小时
- 虫号: 30021
- 注册: 2003-11-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
5楼2011-02-21 15:53:58