24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2726  |  回复: 21
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hn_zht

铁虫 (著名写手)


[交流] 帮忙看外审 意见什么 意思 ?

大家给解释一下红色的句子是什么意思:是我的 文章中再说 明 这几个图的时候没有 引入数据,还是 说我的 图 没有加 偏差 棒 ?谢谢!

Reviewer #1: This manuscript deals with the production of curdlan, a very interesting polysaccharide with the potential for being used in medicine.  It focuses in the optimisation if its fermentation process. The experimental design used in this work is well structured, however it lacks in discussion. Important fermentation and growth parameters, such as DO and glucose consumption, have been chosen to evaluate curdlan production and the further nucleotide studies are promising to obtain more insight of carbon metabolic fluxes. Furthermore, the suggested two-stage fermentation strategy is an excellent extension of the work done before However, I suggest that results should be presented in a more clear way (the Tables are confusing, and Textand there isn't any statiscal evidence in the figures presented, for example the use of "apparent effect" (p9, l26) and " significant" are not valid, unless there is stats provided. I would also like to mention that there are several formating
errors and english mistakes that should be carefully revised.

[ Last edited by hn_zht on 2011-1-2 at 09:53 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

韩俊

金虫 (正式写手)


★ ★
hn_zht(金币+1):谢谢参与
猪会飞(金币+1):鼓励交流应助 2011-01-02 15:23:19
我感觉他的意思可能是你没有作显著性差异分析,就不能用"apparent effect"和 " significant"这些词吧
10楼2011-01-02 12:50:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 22 个回答

chengcj.2008

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


★ ★
hn_zht(金币+1):谢谢参与
xj850626(金币+1):鼓励交接解答 2011-01-02 12:25:04
整体意见还挺好. 最后好像是说你表达不够清楚, 论据不充分. 再仔细研究的你的表格, 图, 力争毫不含糊地表达或支持某个论点.
4楼2011-01-02 10:24:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

melody

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)



hn_zht(金币+1):谢谢参与
引用回帖:
Originally posted by chengcj.2008 at 2011-01-02 10:24:01:
整体意见还挺好. 最后好像是说你表达不够清楚, 论据不充分. 再仔细研究的你的表格, 图, 力争毫不含糊地表达或支持某个论点.

right
5楼2011-01-02 11:33:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nzhth

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)



hn_zht(金币+1):谢谢参与
红色部分是说论据不够充分,不能得出那么明确或强烈的结论。
9楼2011-01-02 12:45:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见