24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4441)
>文献求助 (473)
>虫友互识 (416)
>导师招生 (380)
>考博 (212)
>博后之家 (188)
>硕博家园 (170)
>休闲灌水 (166)
>论文投稿 (141)
>基金申请 (96)
>考研 (77)
>招聘信息布告栏 (72)
>教师之家 (64)
>公派出国 (48)
>绿色求助(高悬赏) (47)
>找工作 (42)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ly0510

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 423.8
散金: 1000
红花: 3
帖子: 509
在线: 83.3小时
虫号: 578165
注册: 2008-06-27
性别: MM
专业: 有机高分子功能材料

[交流] 求答复审稿人的模板已有9人参与

请问大家，投修改稿时应该怎么做？对审稿人提出的问题，有些在文章中修改了，有些无法修改需要解释说明的，这样我除了投修改稿外，是不是还要上传一份修改说明呢？这个具体改怎么表达，有没有类似的模板可以参考啊，多谢高手指点啊！

回复此楼

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

zndxguo

» 猜你喜欢

请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有5人回复
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗已经有7人回复
申请2026年博士已经有5人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入已经有5人回复
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件已经有6人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果已经有7人回复
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗已经有6人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了已经有7人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢已经有5人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生已经有6人回复

1楼2010-12-10 23:59:57

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

fei_dufe

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 86
帖子: 3
在线: 1.5小时
虫号: 3468476
注册: 2014-10-11
专业: 经济统计学

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

Dear editor and reviewers,
Thank you very much for your careful review and constructive suggestions to our manuscript “*****”. The reviewer's comments are so valuable and helpful for authors to correct and improve our paper. We have tried our best to revise and improve the manuscript, and given an explanation according to each issue of reviewer's report. The revised portion is marked in yellow in the revised manuscript. Here we list the main corrections and the response to the reviwer’s comments in the appendix.

Thank you for your consideration again.

Sincerely,

赞一下

回复此楼

11楼2014-12-06 20:53:17

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

查看全部 11 个回答

cai05330

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 1398.2
红花: 1
帖子: 126
在线: 111.9小时
虫号: 801925
注册: 2009-07-01
专业: 金属材料的力学行为

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

必须的，小木虫里有模板，搜一下就行了
Dear editors and reviewers:

Thank you very much for your careful review and constructive suggestions with regard to our manuscript “************************” (ID: ***************). Those comments are helpful for authors to revise and improve our paper. We have studied comments carefully and tried our best to revise and improve the manuscript and made great changes in the manuscript according to the referees′ good comments. Revised portion is marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the corrections will meet with approval. Please feel free to contact us with any questions and we are looking forward to your consideration. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: **************（审稿人意见）
Responds:
Responds:
We are very sorry for our negligence of in our manuscript（客气话根据情况确定）. We have revised our introduction, and the revised part in introduction is following:

赞一下(5人)

回复此楼

2楼2010-12-11 11:06:15

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖