| 查看: 5975 | 回复: 51 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
siyu2009-h铜虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
第一次投SCI，修改一次后被拒，该怎么办？急切！谢谢！ 已有47人参与
|
||
|
大家好！我是新人，真挚的谢谢每位回复的虫友。 我第一次投SCI,投的是APPL ＯＰＴＩＣＳ，以下是主编的回复，请问我应该改投还是认真修改之后还投这个杂志。再一次谢谢给我建议的虫友！ Dear Ms. －－－: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely   ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Unfortunately, I feel that the authors have neither adequately addressed all of my own comments for mandatory amendments, or those of the other three reviewers. The paper itself is worthy of publication, but not in this form. It still requires a considerable amount of work to increase basic clarity. The problems of clarity of basic explanation are undoubtedly compounded by a poor quality of written English and language use throughout. Although the authors say in their response that they have tried to improve the English language, in reality the quality of the amended manuscript is little different to the original, and in some cases it is worse. Also, in the document supplied by the authors in response to the reviewer’s comments, several points have been addressed only within this document, i.e. directly to the reviewers, rather than having been addressed in the paper by amending the manuscript itself. Therefore, I conclude that without a further round of amendments, which is not allowed under the AO refereeing guidelines, the quality of the paper is not sufficiently high to merit publication in AO and I must therefore recommend rejection of the paper. Should the authors wish to re-submit afresh, I would recommend getting somebody else to look at the written language and to improve clarity. The technical material is worthy of publication, but the paper must be improved. ---------------------------- |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
NSFC申报书里申请人简历中代表性论著还需要在申报书最后的附件里面再上传一遍吗
已经有14人回复
-
材料与化工一志愿南昌大学327求调剂推荐
已经有6人回复
-
化学调剂0703
已经有7人回复
-
327求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
调剂
已经有8人回复
-
梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入
已经有7人回复
-
伙伴们，祝我生日快乐吧
已经有24人回复
-
中科院材料273求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料工程专硕274一志愿211求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
本人考085602 化学工程 专硕
已经有8人回复
12楼2010-11-21 17:45:01
2楼2010-11-21 16:17:13
smurfen
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 21002.6
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 2640
- 在线: 151.2小时
- 虫号: 340110
- 注册: 2007-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 微生物遗传育种学
3楼2010-11-21 16:17:40
starared
禁虫 (著名写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 6080.8
- 散金: 172
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1825
- 在线: 762.4小时
- 虫号: 1137379
- 注册: 2010-11-02
- 专业: 样品前处理方法与技术
主要是语言问题,找牛人帮助修改吧
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
主要是语言问题,找牛人帮助修改吧 本文来自: 小木虫论坛 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2617839&fpage=1 |
4楼2010-11-21 16:23:00
