| 查看: 4898 | 回复: 76 | |||
| 本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xia_chong金虫 (文坛精英)
|
[交流]
【Discussion】Do you approve animal experiments?
|
||
[ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 16:43 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
271求调剂
已经有6人回复
312求调剂
已经有9人回复
352求调剂
已经有4人回复
085602化学工程求调剂。
已经有3人回复
085600材料与化工306
已经有6人回复
机械学硕310分,数一英一,一志愿211本科双非找调剂信息
已经有3人回复
一志愿西南交通 专硕 材料355 本科双非 求调剂
已经有6人回复
085602 289分求调剂
已经有8人回复
085601求调剂总分293英一数二
已经有4人回复
292求调剂
已经有10人回复

药化王帅
木虫 (小有名气)
- ESEPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1818.4
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 130
- 在线: 51.5小时
- 虫号: 2122883
- 注册: 2012-11-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 合成药物化学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
winter_north: 金币+5, It should be done, I think. 2013-03-23 03:45:19
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2013-04-10 03:06:53
winter_north: 金币+5, It should be done, I think. 2013-03-23 03:45:19
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2013-04-10 03:06:53
| Anyway .It is really a knotty question all along!Years past,it is still up in the air.How to deal with the slowly burning fuse is not only some superficial actions,but also a dramatic about face.In detial,it has much to do with our traditional convention and our country's brilliant cultures.From my prospctive,as a drug researcher,animal experients is independiable and it is really make a lot of sense to our health and the steady development of our economy.Although sometimes it was deemed that animal experients are merciless,but for our ambition,I approve! |

65楼2013-03-17 20:13:10
xia_chong
金虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 43
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.591
- 金币: 10270.8
- 散金: 2377
- 红花: 34
- 沙发: 160
- 帖子: 12455
- 在线: 1941.8小时
- 虫号: 804303
- 注册: 2009-07-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
- 管辖: English Cafe

4楼2010-10-31 16:32:05
xuanxuankaoyan
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- ESEPI: 39
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.302
- 金币: 10726.6
- 散金: 4772
- 红花: 21
- 沙发: 39
- 帖子: 7428
- 在线: 1088.3小时
- 虫号: 509186
- 注册: 2008-02-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 植物学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
|
i approve and the reason could be listed as follows: 1.Animals suffer great pain when being tested. that is right. but it deserves. Does that mean that we drop the chance to test animals whereas choose a human beings directly instead? however our human beings suffer great pain as well when we are sick. we can use a large variety of natural resources to develop our knowledge to the unknown world, and eventurally make great contribution to a better understanding of the relationship between our human beings and animals. 2.Animals live unfreely before they are tested. that is also the truth. ok, we free them, and let them do whatever they like to do. What a consequence can you imagin if this happen? it is surely coming to a hug mess, and even can not help us explore the real interest into it. Besides if done like this, it is difficult to explain the treatment variation, and hard to find the reason. 3. Animals would die in most cases. That is belonging to the part of the truth. If possible, I hope this could be assessed right if only it does not matter to the surroundings interruption. Whereas it is really dangerous to release them to be free or to be recycled. Maybe its death could rightly explain how can be safe to these animals when put into the situation similiar to the test, or make it clear that to what extent that we can control them when they come to an extremly dangerous level. [ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 17:30 ] |
5楼2010-10-31 17:22:46
fangye0413
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
快乐家族之水
- ESEPI: 19
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.05
- 金币: 13450.6
- 散金: 11919
- 红花: 94
- 沙发: 137
- 帖子: 27945
- 在线: 1588.4小时
- 虫号: 820756
- 注册: 2009-08-03
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: English Cafe

6楼2010-10-31 18:04:06


















回复此楼
20