| 查看: 4714 | 回复: 76 | |||
| 本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xia_chong金虫 (文坛精英)
|
[交流]
【Discussion】Do you approve animal experiments?
|
||
[ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 16:43 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
不自信的我
已经有11人回复
北核录用
已经有3人回复
要不要辞职读博?
已经有6人回复
实验室接单子
已经有3人回复
磺酰氟产物,毕不了业了!
已经有8人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站,青基依托单位怎么办?
已经有10人回复
26申博(荧光探针方向,有机合成)
已经有4人回复
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有26人回复
2026年机械制造与材料应用国际会议 (ICMMMA 2026)
已经有4人回复
Cas 72-43-5需要30g,定制合成,能接单的留言
已经有8人回复

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
winter_north: 金币+9, Yes, for the sake of the interests of human being, it is necessary to do so. 2013-03-23 03:44:26
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2013-03-23 03:44:30
winter_north: 金币+9, Yes, for the sake of the interests of human being, it is necessary to do so. 2013-03-23 03:44:26
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2013-03-23 03:44:30
|
About this topic,I can sure I agree to go on animal experiment. Maybe there are many animals suffer bad treat,even died in the end.But from our perpective,if we don't do our experiment by animals,we cannot get the true answers.So,in this case,we need their help.Yeah,that's unfair to them.BUt this is a rule of the nature.If you control the world,you must do something for yourself.Of course,our animal experiment not only for ourselves,but also for animals.For example,more and more animal hospital be built.We must go on our animal experiment,then,we can make progress. We should respect the animal,we should love them.But that not means we should treat them like treat humen.If so,we cannot have the meat of animals.Do you believe that could be archived?I am afraid not.So,in much time,we can onlt express our love in different way.If in future,we can find something replace the animal for experiment,I think we can change it. That's just my own opinion. |

64楼2013-03-17 20:02:05
xia_chong
金虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 43
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.591
- 金币: 10270.8
- 散金: 2377
- 红花: 34
- 沙发: 160
- 帖子: 12455
- 在线: 1941.8小时
- 虫号: 804303
- 注册: 2009-07-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
- 管辖: English Cafe

4楼2010-10-31 16:32:05
xuanxuankaoyan
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- ESEPI: 39
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.302
- 金币: 10726.6
- 散金: 4772
- 红花: 21
- 沙发: 39
- 帖子: 7428
- 在线: 1088.3小时
- 虫号: 509186
- 注册: 2008-02-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 植物学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
fangye0413(金币+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
|
i approve and the reason could be listed as follows: 1.Animals suffer great pain when being tested. that is right. but it deserves. Does that mean that we drop the chance to test animals whereas choose a human beings directly instead? however our human beings suffer great pain as well when we are sick. we can use a large variety of natural resources to develop our knowledge to the unknown world, and eventurally make great contribution to a better understanding of the relationship between our human beings and animals. 2.Animals live unfreely before they are tested. that is also the truth. ok, we free them, and let them do whatever they like to do. What a consequence can you imagin if this happen? it is surely coming to a hug mess, and even can not help us explore the real interest into it. Besides if done like this, it is difficult to explain the treatment variation, and hard to find the reason. 3. Animals would die in most cases. That is belonging to the part of the truth. If possible, I hope this could be assessed right if only it does not matter to the surroundings interruption. Whereas it is really dangerous to release them to be free or to be recycled. Maybe its death could rightly explain how can be safe to these animals when put into the situation similiar to the test, or make it clear that to what extent that we can control them when they come to an extremly dangerous level. [ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 17:30 ] |
5楼2010-10-31 17:22:46
fangye0413
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
快乐家族之水
- ESEPI: 19
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.05
- 金币: 13450.6
- 散金: 11919
- 红花: 94
- 沙发: 137
- 帖子: 27945
- 在线: 1588.4小时
- 虫号: 820756
- 注册: 2009-08-03
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: English Cafe

6楼2010-10-31 18:04:06

















回复此楼