| ²é¿´: 4972 | »Ø¸´: 76 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 4 ¸ö ESEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
xia_chong½ð³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾Discussion¡¿Do you approve animal experiments?
|
||
[ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 16:43 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
»·¾³¹¤³Ì 085701£¬267Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
085601Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷±±¹¤Òµ´óѧ³õÊÔ346
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¨0856£©304ÇóBÇøµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
±¾2Ò»Ö¾Ô¸C9-333·Ö£¬²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öк£Ñó320»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§279Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
085601Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖÐɽ´óѧÉîÛÚ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì330Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
293·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¬ÍâÓïΪ¶íÓï
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0856µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸´óÁ¬Àí¹¤´óѧ²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´

happylifeo
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 169.8
- É¢½ð: 531
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 112
- ÔÚÏß: 107.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1084395
- ×¢²á: 2010-08-29
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ò£¸Ð»úÀíÓë·½·¨
¡ï ¡ï
xia_chong(½ð±Ò+2):It is really hard to say! 2010-11-01 10:51:47
xia_chong(½ð±Ò+2):It is really hard to say! 2010-11-01 10:51:47
| IN my opinion, it is a good thing and also a bad thing.Aniamls are our friends ,they have lives and feelings like we humanbeings.Sometimes we can see their tear.SO it's unfair to them when we do some experiments because of human's benefit.BUT you know,humanbeings are selfless.Anything is comparative, so I only can say it's a thing that we can't stop. |
11Â¥2010-11-01 10:46:01
xia_chong
½ð³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- ESEPI: 43
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.591
- ½ð±Ò: 10270.8
- É¢½ð: 2377
- ºì»¨: 34
- ɳ·¢: 160
- Ìû×Ó: 12455
- ÔÚÏß: 1941.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 804303
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-06
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Á£×ÓÎïÀíѧºÍ³¡ÂÛ
- ¹ÜϽ: English Cafe

4Â¥2010-10-31 16:32:05
xuanxuankaoyan
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- ESEPI: 39
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.302
- ½ð±Ò: 10726.6
- É¢½ð: 4772
- ºì»¨: 21
- ɳ·¢: 39
- Ìû×Ó: 7428
- ÔÚÏß: 1088.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 509186
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-22
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ö²Îïѧ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
fangye0413(½ð±Ò+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
fangye0413(½ð±Ò+5, ESEPI+1):yeah,even some merciless,but needed~ 2010-10-31 17:49:52
|
i approve and the reason could be listed as follows: 1.Animals suffer great pain when being tested. that is right. but it deserves. Does that mean that we drop the chance to test animals whereas choose a human beings directly instead? however our human beings suffer great pain as well when we are sick. we can use a large variety of natural resources to develop our knowledge to the unknown world, and eventurally make great contribution to a better understanding of the relationship between our human beings and animals. 2.Animals live unfreely before they are tested. that is also the truth. ok, we free them, and let them do whatever they like to do. What a consequence can you imagin if this happen? it is surely coming to a hug mess, and even can not help us explore the real interest into it. Besides if done like this, it is difficult to explain the treatment variation, and hard to find the reason. 3. Animals would die in most cases. That is belonging to the part of the truth. If possible, I hope this could be assessed right if only it does not matter to the surroundings interruption. Whereas it is really dangerous to release them to be free or to be recycled. Maybe its death could rightly explain how can be safe to these animals when put into the situation similiar to the test, or make it clear that to what extent that we can control them when they come to an extremly dangerous level. [ Last edited by xuanxuankaoyan on 2010-10-31 at 17:30 ] |
5Â¥2010-10-31 17:22:46
fangye0413
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
¿ìÀÖ¼Ò×å֮ˮ
- ESEPI: 19
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 2.05
- ½ð±Ò: 13450.6
- É¢½ð: 11919
- ºì»¨: 94
- ɳ·¢: 137
- Ìû×Ó: 27945
- ÔÚÏß: 1588.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 820756
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-03
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
- ¹ÜϽ: English Cafe

6Â¥2010-10-31 18:04:06



















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥