24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

daxu

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 34 (小学生)
金币: 5840.6
散金: 218
红花: 23
帖子: 824
在线: 761.8小时
虫号: 574494
注册: 2008-06-16
性别: GG
专业: 矿物学(含矿物物理学）

[交流] 我投出去了两篇英文的，一篇已经挂了，另一篇还在等待已有20人参与

阿弥陀佛，我以为很快就被拒呢，一个快两月了，一个一周多了

短时间的已经挂了，好惨啊，两个副主编都认为不好，一个认为研究过时了，另一个认为不能量化，还说英语太烂了，看来得改投了，哎
下面是主编的decision：

In considering the manuscript which you recently submitted to Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, logged and acknowledged as manuscript number ***, I have consulted with two Associate Editors, Dr. William Casey and Dr. Jacques Schott. The specific comments by both AEs are incorporated into an AE Report which is presented at the bottom of this message.

I regret to inform you that in light of the advice and recommendations received from these two Associate Editors I must conclude that we cannot accept this manuscript for publication in Geochimica, nor consider it any further. While the topic of this paper is within the scope of GCA, both AEs advise that it does not present a significant advance in the state of our understanding in this discipline.

I am sorry that I could not give you better news. This action of course implies no prejudice regarding any future submissions you may make to this journal. Thank you for considering Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.

[ Last edited by daxu on 2010-9-14 at 12:44 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

想换工作。大多数高校都是评职称时认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？已经有9人回复
求个博导看看已经有16人回复
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生已经有4人回复
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士已经有5人回复
求助院士们，这个如何合成呀已经有4人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有9人回复
需要合成515-64-0，50g，能接单的留言已经有4人回复
自荐读博已经有4人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有6人回复
带资进组求博导收留已经有10人回复

much to learn

1楼 2010-09-09 17:53:32

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

daxu

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 34 (小学生)
金币: 5840.6
散金: 218
红花: 23
帖子: 824
在线: 761.8小时
虫号: 574494
注册: 2008-06-16
性别: GG
专业: 矿物学(含矿物物理学）

In considering the manuscript which you recently submitted to Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, logged and acknowledged as manuscript number W7794, I have consulted with two Associate Editors, Dr. William Casey and Dr. Jacques Schott. The specific comments by both AEs are incorporated into an AE Report which is presented at the bottom of this message.

I regret to inform you that in light of the advice and recommendations received from these two Associate Editors I must conclude that we cannot accept this manuscript for publication in Geochimica, nor consider it any further. While the topic of this paper is within the scope of GCA, both AEs advise that it does not present a significant advance in the state of our understanding in this discipline.

I am sorry that I could not give you better news. This action of course implies no prejudice regarding any future submissions you may make to this journal. Thank you for considering Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.