24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2270)
>导师招生 (277)
>招聘信息布告栏 (128)
>论文道贺祈福 (102)
>休闲灌水 (89)
>考研 (35)
>找工作 (33)
>生物科学 (28)
>博后之家 (19)
>医学 (18)
>硕博家园 (16)
>虫友互识 (12)
>考博 (10)
>公派出国 (10)
>教师之家 (9)
>文献求助 (9)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

daxu

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 34 (小学生)
金币: 5840.6
散金: 218
红花: 23
帖子: 824
在线: 761.8小时
虫号: 574494
注册: 2008-06-16
性别: GG
专业: 矿物学(含矿物物理学）

[交流] 我投出去了两篇英文的，一篇已经挂了，另一篇还在等待已有20人参与

阿弥陀佛，我以为很快就被拒呢，一个快两月了，一个一周多了

短时间的已经挂了，好惨啊，两个副主编都认为不好，一个认为研究过时了，另一个认为不能量化，还说英语太烂了，看来得改投了，哎
下面是主编的decision：

In considering the manuscript which you recently submitted to Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, logged and acknowledged as manuscript number ***, I have consulted with two Associate Editors, Dr. William Casey and Dr. Jacques Schott. The specific comments by both AEs are incorporated into an AE Report which is presented at the bottom of this message.

I regret to inform you that in light of the advice and recommendations received from these two Associate Editors I must conclude that we cannot accept this manuscript for publication in Geochimica, nor consider it any further. While the topic of this paper is within the scope of GCA, both AEs advise that it does not present a significant advance in the state of our understanding in this discipline.

I am sorry that I could not give you better news. This action of course implies no prejudice regarding any future submissions you may make to this journal. Thank you for considering Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.

[ Last edited by daxu on 2010-9-14 at 12:44 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

much to learn

1楼 2010-09-09 17:53:32

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

daxu

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 34 (小学生)
金币: 5840.6
散金: 218
红花: 23
帖子: 824
在线: 761.8小时
虫号: 574494
注册: 2008-06-16
性别: GG
专业: 矿物学(含矿物物理学）

In considering the manuscript which you recently submitted to Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, logged and acknowledged as manuscript number W7794, I have consulted with two Associate Editors, Dr. William Casey and Dr. Jacques Schott. The specific comments by both AEs are incorporated into an AE Report which is presented at the bottom of this message.

I regret to inform you that in light of the advice and recommendations received from these two Associate Editors I must conclude that we cannot accept this manuscript for publication in Geochimica, nor consider it any further. While the topic of this paper is within the scope of GCA, both AEs advise that it does not present a significant advance in the state of our understanding in this discipline.

I am sorry that I could not give you better news. This action of course implies no prejudice regarding any future submissions you may make to this journal. Thank you for considering Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.