| 查看: 3029 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
帖一个NSF的评审标准，同时为自己的青基祈福！ 已有15人参与
|
|||
|
Belows are the reviewing guidelines: “What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?” - Does the proposal have a sound approach to establish technical and commercial feasibility? - Does the proposal suggest and explore unique or ingenious concepts or applications? Please note that an innovation can be interpreted as providing a novel commercial product to the marketplace that meets a critical need. - Does the team have the qualifications to carry out the work plan? - Does the company have sufficient access to resources, such as materials, supplies, analytical services, equipment, facilities, etc., to carry out the work plan? - Does the proposed project reflect revolutionary advances in the field? “What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?” - What would be the commercial and/or societal benefits of this project, if successful? - Would this project lead to a marketable product or process? - What is the competitive advantage of the proposed concept? - Could this project lead to enabling technologies? - If successful, could this project attract funding from non-SBIR sources? - Does the business team possess the relevant skills to commercialize the proposed innovation? - If the company has received previous SBIR or STTR funding, please review the Company’s Commercialization History (found in the Supplementary Documents module) and comment on the percentage of the revenues from previous SBIR/STTR funding. - If the project broadens the participation of underrepresented groups, please comment on it. “Summary Statement” - Summarize your overall evaluation of the proposal. I would also like to list the funding criteria of NSF SBIR/STTR program as below for your reference. - Must be high-risk and high-payback innovations with high commercial potentials. - Demonstrate strategic partnerships with research collaborators, customers and equity investors. NSF do NOT fund, - Basic research projects. - Evolutionary optimization of existing products and processes or modifications to broaden the scope of an existing product, process or application. - Analytical or market studies of technologies. - Clinical trials. ***************************** You don't need to address every questions, your most important parts are to indicate the strengths and weakness of the proposal, then rank the proposal as (one of them) Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国自然评审意见
已经有8人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有12人回复
-
有没有仍没收到信息的
已经有3人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有8人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有11人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有9人回复
-
2026年叶企孙基金
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 为自己的青年基金祈福一下，希望能中。若中，散光金币
已经有119人回复
- 第一次青基的评审意见（1个建议资助，2个建议不资助），明年能否接着再报这个课题？
已经有4人回复
- 大跨度转专业后第一次申请青基，竟然中了，感谢评审老师！！
已经有7人回复
- 第一次写青基，意外中了，感恩，谢谢我的老师，谢谢评审肯定
已经有143人回复
- 散金币，为青基和上海市教委科研项目祈福！
已经有138人回复
- 老公青基上会，期待好消息，来小木虫祈福，如果中了，散尽所有金币.
已经有69人回复
- 祈福，今年申请的青基如果中了发1000金币庆祝一下。
已经有130人回复
- 青基提交，为它祈福，如能中，散尽所有金币
已经有254人回复
- 青基二审被淘汰，贴评审意见帮忙分析，明年再战
已经有9人回复
- 我的青基评审意见，请虫友帮忙看看
已经有16人回复
- 青基挂了，晒晒我的评审意见
已经有6人回复
cuiwq456
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5648.2
- 红花: 4
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 1617
- 在线: 111.8小时
- 虫号: 957698
- 注册: 2010-02-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 石油、天然气地质学
3楼2010-08-10 14:33:04
hblgczy
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 81 (初中生)
- 金币: 26598.8
- 散金: 168
- 红花: 37
- 沙发: 38
- 帖子: 11565
- 在线: 1274.2小时
- 虫号: 348922
- 注册: 2007-04-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学
2楼2010-08-10 14:13:00
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
 |
5楼2010-08-10 14:41:48
6楼2010-08-10 15:37:06
投票:
10