24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3075  |  回复: 15

johozhang

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 帖一个NSF的评审标准,同时为自己的青基祈福! 已有15人参与

Belows are the reviewing guidelines:

“What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?”

-  Does the proposal have a sound approach to establish technical and commercial feasibility?

-  Does the proposal suggest and explore unique or ingenious concepts or applications? Please note that an innovation can be interpreted as providing a novel commercial product to the marketplace that meets a critical need.

-  Does the team have the qualifications to carry out the work plan?

-  Does the company have sufficient access to resources, such as materials, supplies, analytical services, equipment, facilities, etc., to carry out the work plan?

-  Does the proposed project reflect revolutionary advances in the field?

“What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?”

-  What would be the commercial and/or societal benefits of this project, if successful?

-  Would this project lead to a marketable product or process?

-  What is the competitive advantage of the proposed concept?

-  Could this project lead to enabling technologies?

-  If successful, could this project attract funding from non-SBIR sources?

-  Does the business team possess the relevant skills to commercialize the proposed innovation?

-  If the company has received previous SBIR or STTR funding, please review the Company’s Commercialization History (found in the Supplementary Documents module) and comment on the percentage of the revenues from previous SBIR/STTR funding.

-  If the project broadens the participation of underrepresented groups, please comment on it.

“Summary Statement”

-  Summarize your overall evaluation of the proposal.


I would also like to list the funding criteria of NSF SBIR/STTR program as below for your reference.

-  Must be high-risk and high-payback innovations with high commercial potentials.

-  Demonstrate strategic partnerships with research collaborators, customers and equity investors.


NSF do NOT fund,

-  Basic research projects.

-  Evolutionary optimization of existing products and processes or modifications to broaden the scope of an existing product, process or application.

-  Analytical or market studies of technologies.

-  Clinical trials.

*****************************

You don't need to address every questions, your most important parts are to indicate the strengths and weakness of the proposal, then rank the proposal as (one of them)
Excellent
Very good
Good
Fair
Poor
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hblgczy

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
什么基金呀,还是英文版
有志者,事竟成,破釜沉舟,百二秦关终属楚;苦心人,天不负,卧薪尝胆,三千越甲可吞吴。
2楼2010-08-10 14:13:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cuiwq456

木虫 (著名写手)

抢个冷板凳
3楼2010-08-10 14:33:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

materyang

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

给老外看到
4楼2010-08-10 14:41:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
5楼2010-08-10 14:41:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mxtfirst

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
NSF是美国国家自然科学基金吧
6楼2010-08-10 15:37:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bthgg

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
很不错哦 英文的看不懂 嘿嘿
7楼2010-08-10 15:39:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

晴空2721

银虫 (小有名气)

看不懂 嘿嘿
天道酬勤
8楼2010-08-10 15:56:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

superdr

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
NSF:美国国家自然基金会
9楼2010-08-10 16:43:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
祝福!!
10楼2010-08-10 17:07:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 johozhang 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[公派出国] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 4/200 2026-09-03 03:14 by rM1TE0WVDIIY
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 6/300 2026-09-02 23:59 by rM1TE0WVDIIY
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +14 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 15/750 2026-09-02 19:35 by liumei0601
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 14/700 2026-09-02 17:33 by ma0526
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
信息提示
请填处理意见