24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2338  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lizi.chen9080

[交流] JACS审稿意见,大家帮我看看重投的话中的机率大吗?已有9人参与

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.  Your Communication has been examined by expert reviewers whose comments are attached.  The reviewers have raised significant questions about your manuscript as presently written. These will require a substantial amount of new experimentation to address.  If you feel you can address these concerns in a greatly revised manuscript, then I will permit resubmission.  Such a manuscript would be considered a new submission and should be expanded from its present communication form to full article format.   It may or may not be returned to the same reviewers.  If you choose to do this, you should reference this decision letter and manuscript number.

[ Last edited by lizi.chen9080 on 2010-8-1 at 07:46 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hehongwei4103

铜虫 (正式写手)

lizi.chen9080(金币+1):要补的实验还不少,所以不知道有没有必要重投,如果拖的时间太长怕会耽误毕业呢,o(︶︿︶)o 唉 2010-07-31 16:58:49
有机会
但是好像需要补充数据啊  有点难度啊
5楼2010-07-31 16:31:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lizi.chen9080 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见