24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3319  |  回复: 15

wqffl

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
希望你近期能有好消息哦
11楼2010-07-31 17:31:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mplanck

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

之上又是啥子虫虫?


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
呕,这么慢
不知不觉过2W了!那向3W挺进~~
12楼2010-07-31 17:46:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nagtive

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)

忍不住昨天催稿了,结果要修改,第一次投不知道下面的结果是好是坏,另外,他的意思是不是要改一下参考文献和增加一个精度的表格就好了?哪位指点下,谢谢。
Thank you for sending the paper, "******," for consideration by Energy Conversion and Management. I apologize for the lengthy period of review. The reviews are now complete, and, unfortunately, they are not completely favorable. Therefore, the paper cannot be published in Energy Conversion and Management as it is presently written. I have consolidated the comments of the three reviewers below in the hope that they will be helpful to you.

In order to be acceptable for publication in the archival literature, a significant contribution, something new or improved, is required in addition to the work being correct and of high quality. Eighteen references, none of which were published by Energy Conversion and Management, are listed, and 16 of the 18 references are cited in the Introduction during the critique of the pertinent literature. The critique of the literature has identified a significant contribution to the archival literature that this work possibly could provide, namely ******. Nevertheless, the papers needs to be improved somewhat before it can be accepted for publication. Citations of multiple references, like [2-15], are totally useless when evaluating the archival literature to identify some deficiency this work can address because of their lack of specificity. The purpose of citations in a paper is two-fold: (1) to credit the source of a statement or information, or (2) to provide a starting point for an interested reader to explore a topic further. Be specific in citations. Citations of multiple references do not indicate anything other than carelessness. A reference should be cited for any standards employed. Figure 4 is blank. Any item mentioned that bears a scientist's name, or any other non-descriptive name, must be accompanied with a brief description and a citation of a listed reference in which the item may be found fully explained unless the item may be regarded as universally known among scientists. The measurement accuracies of all sensors must be provided. Then, these measurement accuracies must be used to estimate the uncertainties in all calculated experimental information. A table of the accuracies and uncertainties is a good way to present this information. If these few concerns are addressed completely, carefully and successfully in a revised paper, such revised paper very probably will be acceptable for publication.

A separate file containing the detailed responses of the authors to the review comments and the resulting revisions of the manuscript must be submitted on EES. After having submitted the separate response file, another separate file containing the revised manuscript must be submitted on EES. Thus two entirely separate files, and only two, must be submitted on EES (nothing should be submitted in author comments and the separate response file must not be included in the revised manuscript separate file).

I hope these comments will be helpful to you. My sense of the reviewers' comments is that there is an excellent basis on which I can recommend that this paper be revised and re-submitted to Energy Conversion and Management. Thank you again for sending this paper to Energy Conversion and Management for consideration.
13楼2010-08-06 11:09:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dale79

金虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by cuiwq456 at 2010-07-29 21:06:11:
那就慢慢等呀

你真挺!
14楼2010-08-24 20:30:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chandeyishen

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
Revision 也需要210天,我后悔了,但是都revise了,只能听天由命了!
15楼2011-01-08 16:31:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

2013冰

银虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
13楼: Originally posted by nagtive at 2010-08-06 11:09:57
忍不住昨天催稿了,结果要修改,第一次投不知道下面的结果是好是坏,另外,他的意思是不是要改一下参考文献和增加一个精度的表格就好了?哪位指点下,谢谢。
Thank you for sending the paper, "******," for cons ...

请问你文章最后被录用了吗?
博士,科研,科学家,贡献社会,人之常情
16楼2017-07-26 14:13:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 nagtive 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 0XLacIJUOj8D 2026-08-24 6/300 2026-08-25 00:11 by BZKMTicpDhFj
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +5 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 5/250 2026-08-24 23:28 by 我4大白菜
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +7 scalable 2026-08-24 7/350 2026-08-24 23:01 by anata1209
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +7 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-24 22:00 by maomao_da
[论文投稿] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 0XLacIJUOj8D 2026-08-24 3/150 2026-08-24 21:59 by BZKMTicpDhFj
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +21 koalala 2026-08-24 24/1200 2026-08-24 19:25 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +17 羊腰板 2026-08-21 19/950 2026-08-24 16:52 by iaeyuan
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +13 kulium 2026-08-21 16/800 2026-08-24 16:27 by superceng
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +17 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 21/1050 2026-08-24 14:21 by refreshing11
[基金申请] 估计是周四 +4 archvillain 2026-08-18 4/200 2026-08-24 13:53 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +6 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 7/350 2026-08-24 11:58 by 6543yes
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 20+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 17/850 2026-08-24 10:20 by echo8914667
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +10 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 11/550 2026-08-24 06:50 by 开心的小狮子
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +4 process2012 2026-08-23 5/250 2026-08-23 19:58 by jurkat.1640
[教师之家] 跳槽后在研项目怎么办? +5 简单化xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by 简单化xn
[基金申请] 只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫 +24 yaoyewhu2008 2026-08-20 26/1300 2026-08-22 17:43 by kammury
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 重要消息,中午系统在维护 +11 yuleib84 2026-08-18 12/600 2026-08-20 11:09 by xskun
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
信息提示
请填处理意见