| 查看: 1539 | 回复: 49 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zerohead禁虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
*** About the weekly translation #7 ***
|
||
|
每周英语翻译学习交流第七期—“译”气呵成 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2176547 英文： The Chinese themselves were bitterly divided over how to response to the Western inroads, whether to reach back to Chinese isolation or reach out to Western technology in the hope of gaining sufficient strength to repel the foreigners. But even those who argued for adoption of Western technology saw Western ways as a corrupting, unwelcome influence. （提供）参考答案： 如何对待西方的入侵，是恢复闭关自守还是吸收西方技术以期获取赶走外国人的足够力量，在中国人内部发生了严重的分歧。但是，即使主张采用西方技术的人，也把西方方式看做是一种腐朽的、不受欢迎的影响。 ================================================== Now let’s take a look of the Chinese translation of the first sentence: “如何对待。。。入侵，是。。。闭关自守还是。。。” Do you think it is logical? How could the reaction to the military invasion be “reach back to isolation”? How could it be done? If you are invaded by another country, then there are only two results: you win the war, or you lost the war, that means you lost the country. How could you just “reach back to isolation”? No way. So the question is: Does the word "inroad" in the first English sentence really means "入侵"? If anybody can supply the original article of the English version, we will be more clear about that. Thank you very much. [ Last edited by zerohead on 2010-7-9 at 16:04 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
xia_chong
金虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 43
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.591
- 金币: 10270.8
- 散金: 2377
- 红花: 34
- 沙发: 160
- 帖子: 12455
- 在线: 1941.8小时
- 虫号: 804303
- 注册: 2009-07-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
- 管辖: English Cafe
★
lxuyan(金币+1):Work so hard :tiger29::tiger23::tiger40::tiger06: 2010-07-09 15:07:14
zerohead(金币+1):"Correction is a way to ..." is deadly wrong, man. 2010-07-10 12:36:06
lxuyan(金币+1):Work so hard :tiger29::tiger23::tiger40::tiger06: 2010-07-09 15:07:14
zerohead(金币+1):"Correction is a way to ..." is deadly wrong, man. 2010-07-10 12:36:06
|
I don't agree with you. Correction is a way to improve our English. If we can't find the errors or write something without considering the errors, we won't do a good job in translation. Translation is part of English and part of art. In order to translate English well, we should have a good knowledge of both of English and Chinese. Have a good day! Welcome your discussion.  |
34楼2010-07-09 14:25:40
xia_chong
金虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 43
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.591
- 金币: 10270.8
- 散金: 2377
- 红花: 34
- 沙发: 160
- 帖子: 12455
- 在线: 1941.8小时
- 虫号: 804303
- 注册: 2009-07-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
- 管辖: English Cafe
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):恭喜抢沙发，给个红包
zerohead(金币+1):Don't be silly, if a dictionary can solve the problem, then machine can do it. 2010-07-11 22:04:09
小木虫(金币+0.5):恭喜抢沙发，给个红包
zerohead(金币+1):Don't be silly, if a dictionary can solve the problem, then machine can do it. 2010-07-11 22:04:09
2楼2010-07-05 18:51:10
xia_chong
金虫 (文坛精英)
- ESEPI: 43
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.591
- 金币: 10270.8
- 散金: 2377
- 红花: 34
- 沙发: 160
- 帖子: 12455
- 在线: 1941.8小时
- 虫号: 804303
- 注册: 2009-07-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
- 管辖: English Cafe
3楼2010-07-05 18:57:31
fangye0413
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
快乐家族之水
- ESEPI: 19
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.05
- 金币: 13450.6
- 散金: 11919
- 红花: 94
- 沙发: 137
- 帖子: 27945
- 在线: 1588.4小时
- 虫号: 820756
- 注册: 2009-08-03
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: English Cafe
4楼2010-07-05 19:04:51
20