| 查看: 3567 | 回复: 35 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
ipp金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
收到审稿意见了，大家帮我看看！ 已有34人参与
|
||
|
Dear Dr ***, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the JIP. Two experts in the field have reviewed your manuscript, and while they find the topic of interest and potential importance, they have noticed substantial flaws that must be corrected before your study can be published in our Journal. I have examined their comments and recommendations for changes to your study and manuscript and I am in full agreement with these. Thus, if you wish to have your manuscript published in the JIP, you will have to address all of their comments on a point-by-point basis and submit a revised manuscript. Your revised manuscript will then be sent to the same two experts for further review to determine its suitability for publication. An important point made by both reviewers is that some of your conclusions can not be drawn without providing additional data to support these points in your manuscript. The reviewers' comments are below. Please submit your revision online within 90 days by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for the JIP You may find the manuscript record listed under "Submissions Needing Revisions." Click "Revise" when you are ready to submit your revision. (If you have forgotten your password, please click the "Forget your password" link located on the log-in screen). When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document uploaded as "Response to Reviews" that carefully addresses the issues raised in the below comments, point by point. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that has not been made. To facilitate the electronic publication of your manuscript (should it be accepted), we request that your manuscript text, tables and figure legend be submitted in an editable format (Word, WordPerfect, or LaTex only), and all figures uploaded individually as TIF or EPS files. Thank you, and we look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. With kind regards, **** PhD Editor-in-Chief JIP |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有11人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
28楼2010-06-28 20:34:59
2楼2010-06-28 10:44:22
zhiyongwang
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 269 (大学生)
- 金币: 48212.2
- 散金: 4813
- 红花: 26
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 25665
- 在线: 1151.4小时
- 虫号: 897198
- 注册: 2009-11-08
- 专业: 分离化学
3楼2010-06-28 11:00:32
felicity6056
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.033
- 金币: 10226.3
- 散金: 389
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 6707
- 在线: 1054.8小时
- 虫号: 762546
- 注册: 2009-05-04
- 专业: 化石能源储存与输送
5楼2010-06-28 11:07:35
20