| 查看: 2730 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
reject and resubmit已有8人参与
|
|||
|
各位虫友，麻烦过来看一下 我的一篇文章在5个月前投到一影响因子为2.0的期刊（本领域算不低的了），被主编直接以英语太烂拒掉。之后修四个月，期间请三位国外友人（美国人一个，在美中国人两个）看过，我还是坚持尝试，一个月前再投，现在结果是reject and resubmit（真不清楚这是啥决定）。主编回信如下： In view of the comments of the referees, I must decline the manuscript for publication in **** at this time. However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments. In the previous version of this manuscript the editor had commented on obscure expressions and written language. The reviewers of the present manuscript raise similar issues. If you wish to resubmit your manuscript, please be sure to respond to the comments of the reviewers in full. Regarding the language usage, you may wish to use an English language checking service, such as those listed on the Wiley web site。。。 Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before a decision is rendered. 附一个审稿人意见： This paper revisits a well-known problem in the modeling of **, that of obtaining accurate and non-oscillatory solutions for coupled hydro-mechanical problems, the difficulty being that the order of the displacement solution has to be greater than that for the pore water pressure. The use of the ** is innovative and a positive feature of this work. 另一个审稿人意见： in the present paper, the ** technique is stabilized by using less points for the pressure approximation than for the displacements. This, essentially, causes the pressure to be approximated with low accuracy than the displacement. Hence, it follows the same idea as Taylor-Hood-elements in a FEM formulation. Surprisingly, the use of different ansatz orders like for Taylor-Hood elemtns does not work for the **. There is no mathematical proof but two studies which show that the idea work. Unfortunately, the essential question what must be the relation between the amount of nodes for the displacement and the pressure approximation is not answered.（帮忙看看这个审稿人是支持还是反对） 其实那两个审稿人提的问题没有特别尖锐的问题，一般是些词语不当之类。 由于作者就是我一个人，在此领域又是第一次，大家有没有这种经验的？感觉好艰难啊，有如此经历的说说看。。。。谢谢。 [ Last edited by hualeina on 2010-6-22 at 10:33 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有23人回复
-
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有11人回复
-
读博
已经有4人回复
-
JMPT 期刊投稿流程
已经有4人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
-
申请2026年博士
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
发了篇IEEE TAC，审了两篇IEEE TAC和IEEE TSP，说点收获
已经有38人回复- 关于reject and resubmit 的问题
已经有14人回复
- 2012年第二篇SCI接收~~~~~~~~~~
已经有113人回复
- MMOR reject and resubmit
已经有15人回复
- 关于Revise and Resubmit as New
已经有6人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有13人回复
- 文章刚被判刑为reject&resubmit，请问一般多少天必须提交修改稿？
已经有5人回复
- 求助 Reject and Resubmit
已经有6人回复
- 有没有两个审稿人一个拒，一个大修，然后编辑reject但是可以resubmit
已经有16人回复
- 论文被拒，编辑意见改后重投
已经有15人回复
- 审稿4个月，投稿系统显示Reject & Resubmit
已经有17人回复
- 关于Reject and Resubmit？？？？？？
已经有12人回复
6楼2010-06-22 22:04:08
xinxin2008
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 789.9
- 散金: 1000
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 264
- 在线: 25.3小时
- 虫号: 602308
- 注册: 2008-09-14
- 专业: 教育学其他学科
2楼2010-06-22 10:57:15
commonman
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4094.3
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 617
- 在线: 225.8小时
- 虫号: 741555
- 注册: 2009-04-06
- 专业: 计算机网络
3楼2010-06-22 11:33:48
4楼2010-06-22 12:21:27