24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5856  |  回复: 103

gdk199

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 论文小修,今天接收了,再散40金币

今天文章终于接收了,感谢小木虫给我提供的一些写作信息,让我在写论文的过程中的学到了许多,文章接收总共耗时50天,个人觉得比较快,当然还有更牛的虫子半个月以内就接收的。还是感到很幸运,这是本人的第一篇外文,想起来还是觉得以前的辛酸值得的。

这是7号还没接收的时候发的
以下是主编给我的回信,主要是修改两个很小的地方,修改稿是6月3号上传的,4号with editor,过了周末,没变状态,希望今天能给我审一下,急切期待中,这两天查邮件都快疯了,希望广大虫子也为我祈福。还有,问一下,像我这种情况,一般还要审多久,有经验的虫子点拨一下。
Dear XXXXXXXX,

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.

However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.

If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also:

a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments
   
  AND/OR

b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed


To submit your revision, please do the following:

1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/

2. Enter your login details

3. Click [Author Login]
This takes you to the Author Main Menu.

4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision]

When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.  If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.

I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,


Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer: The paper on the microstructural development in Mg alloy describes the age hardening as function of heat treatment for a total of 8 hours at three different temperatures. The paper has a good background description of these types of alloys and their microstructural characteristics, and provides a solid motivation for the current work. The experimental procedures follow well-established and known approaches. The results of the investigation deals with a limited, though interesting, amount of work, and the paper is therefore merely suitable for consideration as a short communication or technical note. The conclusions are factual and contribute to the knowledge in this field. A reasonable number of references nicely concludes this piece of work.

Editor: The reviewer has not recommended any changes, however there are very minor areas of your paper that need attention:
1. In Figure 3 use correct spelling of 'Vickers' for vertical axis label.
2. Include university email address in contact details.

[ Last edited by gdk199 on 2010-6-10 at 19:58 ]
回复此楼
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
2楼2010-06-07 13:48:45
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
祝福
3楼2010-06-07 13:51:45
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leena

铜虫 (小有名气)


gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
不同期刊不一样,editor发给reviewer就看reviewer的时间了。祝福。
4楼2010-06-07 13:52:35
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljh211

禁虫 (正式写手)


gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
gxgx
取舍一念间,进退一瞬间
5楼2010-06-07 13:52:55
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gdk199

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by leena at 2010-06-07 13:52:35:
不同期刊不一样,editor发给reviewer就看reviewer的时间了。祝福。

可是reviewr 根本就没意见啊,还要发给他看吗
6楼2010-06-07 13:53:38
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
祝福~~~
7楼2010-06-07 13:57:05
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

love6417

木虫 (著名写手)


gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
祝福楼主
8楼2010-06-07 13:59:03
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jssunyz

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
祝福楼主 ~~~~~
9楼2010-06-07 13:59:29
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mjt168168

木虫 (著名写手)


gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
祝福楼主
10楼2010-06-07 14:00:43
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 gdk199 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 12/600 2026-09-02 10:49 by 瞬息宇宙
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +4 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 8/400 2026-09-02 10:35 by 瞬息宇宙
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +17 晴天加油 2026-08-26 19/950 2026-09-02 10:07 by 奶奶的心意
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +5 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-09-01 17:54 by 小伟大博士
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +6 yuleib84 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-31 19:46 by 鱼翔浅底1
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
信息提示
请填处理意见