24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

qinshuping

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 262.8
散金: 751
红花: 5
帖子: 559
在线: 303.2小时
虫号: 588071
注册: 2008-08-22
性别: GG
专业: 土壤生态学

[交流] 大修5个月后变小修（本人金币少发10金币）

european journal of soil biology 大修5个月后变小修
Dear 。。。。。,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. They recommend minor revision and that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider your paper for publication. For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point raised by the reviewers when you submit the revised manuscript.

Please note that minor revisions should be submitted within 30 days.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/ejsobi/ and login as an Author. Your username is Your username is: If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/ejsobi/automail_query.asp

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely,

Yakov Kuzyakov
Field Editor
European Journal of Soil Biology

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The revision is careful and intensive. The authors have answered my doubts and modified all the mistakes and shortcomings. However, I still gave a few suggestions in the PDF file.

In general, I would like to recommend the publication of this paper in your journal after a slight revision.

Reviewer #3: "Responses of soil chemical and microbial indicators to conservational tillage versus traditional tillage in the North China Plain" (Manuscript ID: EJSOBI-D-09-00085R1).

I have carefully read and checked through the revised manuscript submitted by Hu et al. The authors have responded and satisfactorily explained the comments. This paper falls in the general scope of the journal. It is a concise and clear paper that investigates the soil chemical and microbial indicators between conservational tillage and traditional tillage in a Haplic Cambisol in the North China Plain. The overall design of the study is good. However, the aim of the study should be explained a bit more clearly. The language of the paper could have been more academic. Overall, I think this is a nice through study which yields interesting findings. I have no further comments on the revised manuscript EJSOBI-D-09-00085R1. My decision is that the manuscript is now acceptable for publication in European Journal of Soil biology.

回复此楼