24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2025级博士研究生招生报考通知
查看: 2344  |  回复: 10
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

gamegreater

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 审稿人和编辑是什么意思呢?已有8人参与

两个审稿人,一个反馈比较好,提了两个很小的疑问,都是比较细节,比较小的。
另一个是说:It is not clear that the conclusions are strong or definitive enough to justify the perusal by a wider audience.
I suggest it should be published in a non-letter journal and that in the meantime the authors would invest more in explaining in more detail their point.

他的第二句的意思是不适合在letter型的杂志发表吗?
那我继续修改还有没有可能被接收呢?

编辑给的信里是这么说的:

Your above mentioned manuscript has been reviewed by our referees. The attached reports contain criticism which is sufficiently adverse that the Co-editor, tom, judged that the paper cannot be accepted on the present basis.

If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may submit a revised version.

Any resubmittal should be accompanied by a summary of the changes made and a detailed response to any criticism you have not attempted to meet.

这种情况应不应该继续修改再投呢,还是转投其他?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gamegreater

银虫 (小有名气)

It is not clear that the conclusions are strong or definitive enough to justify the perusal by a wider audience.
这是第二个审稿人给的唯一意见,这样都不知道从哪里说服他。如果对文章里的模型什么的有意见倒还是好说,这什么都没有怎么办啊?
6楼2010-04-08 16:00:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gamegreater

银虫 (小有名气)

能说说原因吗?
8楼2010-04-08 16:29:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gamegreater

银虫 (小有名气)

哎。。。,真不想改投了,本来就不是很好的期刊了。
11楼2010-04-08 16:54:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 gamegreater 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见