24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2551  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jinguofeng

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Meat Science 文章让大修 已有3人参与

前一段时间投了meat science 的一片文章,今天审稿结果出来啦,让大修。审稿人的意见比较尖锐,大家帮忙看一下,这样的文章进行修改再投是否还有可能。谢谢!
以下是审稿人意见:
Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: The article studies the kinetic parameters of the lipoxygenase from fresh pig bacon belly, and the effect of the temperature, NaCl concentration and pH on its activity. It is a classic study of characterisation of an enzymatic activity.
The lipooxygenase activity in the pork products has special connotations, because it is not totally positive or negative. A certain degree of activity is beneficial to develop the characteristic flavour of these products. However, an excessive lipid oxidation can produce rancidity and undesirable flavours; this aspect was ignored by the authors in the introduction of the article.
Moreover, the technology of manufacture of the cured/ripened pig meat products is perfectly established according to traditional procedures, and the possibilities of to modify the manufacture conditions (NaCl concentrations, ripening temperatures) without producing severe modifications of the organoleptic characteristics of the final products and without affecting its personality are very limited. The possibilities of modify the pH values are still more remote. On the other hand, the oxidative processes are dependent of the presence of oxygen and these processes are only important in the surface of the meat products. For these reasons, the oxidative processes during the manufacture of cured meat products are traditionally modulated only by controlling the duration (time) of the stages in the manufacture.
In my opinion, the reasons exposed in my previous paragraph have made that so far little attention has been paid to the study of this enzymatic activity. For these same reasons the objective mentioned in this paper (lines 60 to 64) in certainly utopian.



CONCRETE POINTS


- Page 3, line 59: safety quality?? Please explain.

- Page 4, lines 66 to 76: The authors used a method of extraction previously described in the literature. Have the authors checked (for example by using electrophoresis or isoelectric focusing methods) the purity of the enzymatic preparations used in this study? This is very important, because the presence of other oxidase activities in the extracts can modify and falsify the data obtained in the study.

- Page 4, lines 78 to 82 and page 5, lines 83 to 89: The method used for the enzymatic activity assay, was it previously described in the literature or was it developed by the authors? Please clarify and, if it is the case, cite the reference in the text.

- Page 7, lines 145 to 148: It is very difficult to justify the differences in the Km values only on the basis of differences of pig breed and location in the carcass. Please explain.

- Page 9, lines 180 to 190 and also figure 3: It would be interesting to study the effect of the NaCl concentrations lower than 2% in order to observe if, at NaCl concentration lower than 2%, the LOX activity also increases as the NaCl concentration increases.

- In the title and also throughout the text: "enzymatic" is a more adequate word than "enzymic".



Reviewer #2: Could you revise title of this paper?
Please check grammar carefully.
What is "interaction effect"?  Usually, we say interaction in study.
You did response surface methodology in this study; however,you did not discuss the results in detail.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

无名小辈
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

浪漫女生

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
态度端正,认真按照审稿人的意见去修改,一定会中的!祝你成功!
追求的过程是最快乐的!
3楼2010-04-02 17:10:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by jinguofeng at 2010-04-02 16:46:24:
前一段时间投了meat science 的一片文章,今天审稿结果出来啦,让大修。审稿人的意见比较尖锐,大家帮忙看一下,这样的文章进行修改再投是否还有可能。谢谢!
以下是审稿人意见:
Reviewers' comments:


Re ...

努力修改就有希望!
2楼2010-04-02 17:04:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Doctorcbw

木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
总比我的好,我的审稿人说 修改后重新投稿 还郁闷 些
5楼2010-04-02 17:20:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yfju

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
肉科学?????是不是
6楼2010-04-02 18:47:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+3 winsaint 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-28 01:46 by alongwaytogo
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +9 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 01:08 by jurkat.1640
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 XLGfUIdOmEAO 2026-08-27 3/150 2026-08-28 00:49 by 3RAFyYXYSwGS
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +5 yuleib84 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 00:02 by yudaoqian88
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +10 eulota 2026-08-26 10/500 2026-08-27 17:23 by lqllinqiaoli
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 LIbGuocjEEYw 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-27 04:33 by Ie9AyIAvGbvs
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +5 huang1991js 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 16:09 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +22 羊腰板 2026-08-21 25/1250 2026-08-26 15:00 by zuocuiping
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
信息提示
请填处理意见