| 查看: 1938 | 回复: 6 | |||||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||||
kqp1982木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
修改后可否再投JCIS？ 已有2人参与
|
||||
|
Dear Dr. Tiandi, Thank you for submitting your article to the Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. Unfortunately, based on the reviewer comments, we regret to inform you that we are unable to publish it. Due to the high demand for space within the pages of this Journal, we must decline a large portion of the manuscripts received. The reviewer comments are summarized below. Sincerely, Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: Recommendation: Reject. Comments: 1. The introduction part of the manuscript is very weak. 2. There are plenty of publications on the topic, which have been not acknowledged in the references of the present manuscript. 3. The authors do not show any motivation for the presented work. 4. What I am missing right away going through this work what is the qualitatively and quantitatively new knowledge that the authors are seeking. 5. Authors reported about low contact angle hysteresis and did not show any results on advancing/receding contact angles. 6. Authors discussed about nano/micro level structures of fabricated coatings, however did not present any results on the values of surface roughness parameters. 7. The explanation/discussion seems to me be not logic and not completed. Especially for this case, one should present roughness parameters values (roughness factor). 8. The terminology used by authors is not always correct. For instance, in the Part 3.2 instead of "Surface Morphous" should be "surface morphology". 9. There are many other experimental uncertainties. In my opinion, the paper does not show any novelty, interesting discussions and suffers from many experimental and theoretical uncertainties. This work does not satisfy the requirements and high level of the Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. The English requires a throughout editing. New physical insights or important experimental developments: Fair Conclusions adequately supported by data: Fair Clarity of presentation: Fair Potential for scientific impact: Fair Reviewer #2: This paper reported ......, which is important in the development of self-cleaning surface. I recommended it to be published on JCIS after some revision: 1.How about the stability and mechanical property of the coating film? Is it easy to peel off from the substrate? How about if we scrape it? 2.It seems from SEM images (Fig. 2) that the coating materials do not cover all the substrate, what will the water droplet change after it sitting longer on the surface? (time-dependent property) 3.The figure that shows the mechanism (Fig. 4) is too ideal. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 投稿须知 | Biosorption |
» 猜你喜欢
什么时候开奖？
已经有4人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有27人回复
-
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低？主要原因有哪些？
已经有3人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有9人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有110人回复
-
明天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有11人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有10人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有6人回复
xiaoguodong
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1250.1
- 散金: 7
- 帖子: 202
- 在线: 110.5小时
- 虫号: 924976
- 注册: 2009-12-11
- 专业: 电化学
2楼2010-03-25 18:08:08
3楼2010-03-25 18:48:56
felicity6056
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.033
- 金币: 10209.1
- 散金: 389
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 6701
- 在线: 1054.7小时
- 虫号: 762546
- 注册: 2009-05-04
- 专业: 化石能源储存与输送
4楼2010-03-25 19:31:48
liushu0226
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 57 (初中生)
- 金币: 16751
- 散金: 138
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 3454
- 在线: 579.2小时
- 虫号: 893462
- 注册: 2009-11-04
- 专业: 污染生态化学
5楼2010-03-25 20:13:45
jwdxbjzh
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.015
- 金币: 10699.3
- 散金: 437
- 红花: 30
- 帖子: 3868
- 在线: 1074.8小时
- 虫号: 611748
- 注册: 2008-09-25
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物无机化学
建议改投
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
依照楼主的情况，我个人建议按照审稿人意见进行修改，然后改投它刊。因为问题和拒稿都很明显地表示你的文章不适宜发表。我2007年在该刊发表过一篇论文，两个审稿人都建议发表，只是提了一些小问题。见下面： Reviewers' comments: Thank you for submitting your nice manuscript JCIS-06-1889 to JCIS. It is clearly of potential interest to JCIS readers. Before passing on to the review stage I am asking you to consider the possibility of making a few (modest) changes, listed below as points 1 and 2. I see the purpose of these changes to make the papers that are eventually published in JCIS concise and interesting to the readership, as well as being scientifically satisfying: this will help attract readers to learn about your research. I trust you understand the motivation for this request, which is primarily so that your research ideas receive as wide an audience as possible. I guarantee that your revision will be promptly dealt with by our JCIS staff in Bristol. Thank you for submitting your nice work to JCIS. Julian Eastoe Editorial comments 1. Supply the names and e-mail contact details of five potential reviewers, who are NOT also members of the JCIS board. The names of board members can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... 2861/editorialboard 2. The main paper does not contain any of the kinetic data, which has in fact been included in supporting material. Please could you include one or two key figures in the revised main manuscript, by moving them from supporting materials into the main paper. This would give the readership a much clearer idea of how the conclusions have been arrived at. It is NOT my suggestion to considerably lengthen the paper, this current length seems fine, but adding some important experimental data will strengthen the main manuscript and improve the scientific credibility. |
6楼2010-04-04 22:19:46
luoxianyang
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 335.3
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 635
- 在线: 68小时
- 虫号: 921566
- 注册: 2009-12-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药物代谢与药物动力学
7楼2010-04-06 12:02:15
