| 查看: 3852 | 回复: 16 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
求助material & design杂志审稿问题 已有7人参与
|
|||
|
各位虫虫大家好，有没有谁投过《materials & design》的？帮我分析一下： 第一次审稿意见： Dear XXX, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, K.L. Edwards Editor in Chief Materials and Design Reviewers' comments: Reviewer: This paper is useful,preparation progress should also influence the performance and should be studied in next step. Editor: Please remove Reference 14, it may not be accepted for publication, and reorder reference citations accordingly - you might think of a reference to replace this reference because would expect 15 to 20 references in total. Place Nomenclature after Acknowledgement and before Reference list. 2. 我按照审稿人的意见修改了，其中，第一个审稿人要求的考虑制备过程因素的影响，我拒绝修改了，给出了我认为比较充分的理由。过了十几天，状态一直是with editor，今天受到第二次审稿意见： DEAR XXX， The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.......... 这一部分都是一样的 I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, K.L. Edwards Editor in Chief Materials and Design Reviewers' comments: Editor: Thank you for making the reviewer and editor requested changes. I apologise but had missed that you used letters in some of your equation labelling - only identify equations using whole numbers. Also please identify your figures. 我想问一下：综合上面两封信，这篇文章是大修还是小修？状态只有revised。另外，我这次按照编辑的意见修改完后，还要不要再送审了？有投过录过的虫虫帮忙解答一下 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有6人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
hxg
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 11660.5
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1437
- 在线: 290.7小时
- 虫号: 600788
- 注册: 2008-09-12
- 专业: 无机非金属基复合材料
16楼2010-06-21 14:44:32
tfyihit
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 39 (小学生)
- 金币: 4636.4
- 散金: 2097
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 2811
- 在线: 383.3小时
- 虫号: 561613
- 注册: 2008-05-22
- 专业: 电化学
2楼2010-03-09 08:17:38
rll
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 17 (小学生)
- 金币: 12714.6
- 散金: 129
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 2639
- 在线: 831.8小时
- 虫号: 543206
- 注册: 2008-04-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料
3楼2010-03-09 08:31:23
quan3145
铁杆木虫 (文学泰斗)
博士
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 44530.4
- 散金: 3777
- 红花: 107
- 沙发: 10
- 帖子: 57739
- 在线: 624.7小时
- 虫号: 794207
- 注册: 2009-06-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 发育生物学
4楼2010-03-09 08:39:33
投票:
20