| ²é¿´: 2009 | »Ø¸´: 16 | |||
xuehu2008ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÇóÖú/½»Á÷¡¿Çó½ÌÒ»¸öͳ¼ÆÑ§ÎÊÌâ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
| Óú¬Óв»Í¬Å¨¶ÈÒ©ÎïµÄÅàÑø»ùËÇÑø¹ûÓ¬£¬¿´Æä¶Ô´ÆÐÛ¹ûÓ¬µÄ²»Í¬ÖÂËÀЧ¹û£¬ÇëÎʸÃÓÃʲôͳ¼ÆÑ§·½·¨·ÖÎö£¿¼´±È½ÏÐÛ¹ûÓ¬ºÍ´Æ¹ûÓ¬µÄ´æ»îÂÊÓÐÎÞÏÔÖøÐÔ²îÒì¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
µ°°×Öʼì²â£º¾«×¼·ÖÎö£¬½âËøÉúÎï·Ö×ÓµÄÃÜÂë
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
²»ºÏÀíÍÜ¿ÆÑÐʵÑé֮СÊóʵÑ飺ÑϽ÷Éè¼Æ£¬½âÎöÉúÃü»úÖÆµÄÖØÒªÔØÌå
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì¼°¹¤Òµ»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ276È˻ظ´
²»ºÏÀíÍÜ¿ÆÑÐʵÑéÖ®ÖØ½ðÊô¼ì²â£º¾«×¼É¸²é£¬ÊØ»¤½¡¿µÓë»·¾³µÄ·ÀÏß
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
²»ºÏÀíÍÜ¿ÆÑÐʵÑéÖ®¡°ÍܲâÖØ½ðÊôÎÒ±³¹øÈýǧ¡±
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
²»ºÏÀíÍÜ¿ÆÑÐʵÑéÖ®¡°ÊóÌÓÈý´ÎÎÒ·¢ÈýƪSCI¡±
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÄÉÃ×Á£¶È·ÖÎö
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÁÖ¿ÆÔºÁÖ»¯ËùÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨ÒµË¶Ê¿£¬×ø±êÄϾ©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Áôѧ--²©Ê¿ÕÐÉú
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì£¬±¾211£¬Çóµ÷¼Á£¬abÇø²»ÏÞ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
|ÇóÖú| ͳ¼ÆÑ§ÖÐÔÚ½øÐÐÏà¹ØÐÔ¼ìÑéʱ£¬PÖµÈçºÎ¼ÆË㣿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Çó½Ì£º¸ÅÂʺÍͳ¼ÆµÄһЩ»ù´¡ÖªÊ¶¡£
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú/½»Á÷¡¿Çó½»ÉúÎïͳ¼ÆÑ§ÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Ò½Ñ§Í³¼ÆÑ§µÄÎÊÌ⣬°ï棬лл
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú/½»Á÷¡¿ÉúÎïͳ¼ÆÑ§ÎÊÌ⣬±äÒìϵÊý
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÈõÈõµÄͳ¼ÆÑ§ÎÊÌ⣬Á½×éÊýµÄÏÔÖøÐÔ²îÒì
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Í³¼ÆÑ§ÇóÖú£¨¹ØÓÚÏÔÖøÐÔ²îÒìµÄ×Öĸ£©
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÇóÖú ÔËÓÃArcGIS Èí¼þ µØÍ³¼ÆÑ§Ä£¿é½øÐÐ Êý¾Ý·ÖÎö Ñ¡ÔñÄ£ÐÍ ÓÐ3¸öÄ£ÐÍ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚÂÛÎÄÊý¾Ý´¦ÀíÖРͳ¼ÆÑ§µÄÏà¹ØÎÊÌâÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ArcgisµØÍ³¼ÆÑ§°ë±äÒ캯ÊýÄ£ÐÍÄâºÏ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿µØÍ³¼ÆÑ§Öоγ¶Èת»»Ö±½Ç×ø±ê
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúÒ»¸ö¼òµ¥µÄͳ¼ÆÑ§ÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
yujiaping1
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- MolEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1365.2
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 1174
- ÔÚÏß: 66.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 929883
- ×¢²á: 2009-12-17
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÒßÃçѧ
|
I wonder how many samples you have. if you design the experiment like this result data (alive ratio)= A treatment concenration= C sex= 0 or 1 0 1 c1 A1(alive/all from a group) A2 c2 A3 A4 c3 A5 A6 c4 A7 A8 . . . . . . . . . you can just use Manova , TWO factors (1th =treatment 2=sex) just compare the two groups (sex) result. however for alive ratio you may have to convert your raw data. eg. -logx for covariance equivalent . In MY opinon it is better to design like this. you get all your flies result as this (alive or dead) (1 or 0) then you can analyse their frequency. but with this design you'd better use Kruskal-Wallis test the goodness of this test is it dosn't need the prelimit of covariance eqivalent goog luck! [ Last edited by yujiaping1 on 2010-1-12 at 13:44 ] |
2Â¥2010-01-12 13:32:24
j2
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 56 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3797.8
- É¢½ð: 2
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 688
- ÔÚÏß: 108.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 452275
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-05
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÎÀÉú¼ìÑé

3Â¥2010-01-12 13:54:38
4Â¥2010-01-12 14:26:25
xuehu2008
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 244.5
- É¢½ð: 95
- Ìû×Ó: 487
- ÔÚÏß: 100Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 570440
- ×¢²á: 2008-06-07
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³ÉúÎïÎïÀí
5Â¥2010-01-12 15:17:53
jzhe961
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 15 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2224.6
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 522
- ÔÚÏß: 212.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 118147
- ×¢²á: 2005-11-26
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: microbiology
6Â¥2010-01-12 15:51:51
xuehu2008
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 244.5
- É¢½ð: 95
- Ìû×Ó: 487
- ÔÚÏß: 100Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 570440
- ×¢²á: 2008-06-07
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³ÉúÎïÎïÀí
7Â¥2010-01-12 22:28:06
yujiaping1
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- MolEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1365.2
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 1174
- ÔÚÏß: 66.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 929883
- ×¢²á: 2009-12-17
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÒßÃçѧ
8Â¥2010-01-13 09:32:45
yujiaping1
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- MolEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1365.2
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 1174
- ÔÚÏß: 66.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 929883
- ×¢²á: 2009-12-17
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÒßÃçѧ
9Â¥2010-01-13 09:34:13
yujiaping1
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- MolEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1365.2
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 1174
- ÔÚÏß: 66.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 929883
- ×¢²á: 2009-12-17
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÒßÃçѧ
10Â¥2010-01-13 10:28:31














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥