24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4985  |  回复: 33
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ypp

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 求助!major-major-minor revision 已有12人参与

我的文章真是命运多舛啊,majorrevision-majorevisionr-minor revision.请问我这次修改好,还用response to reviewers 吗?下面是审稿人和编辑的审稿意见:

Reviewer #1: The manuscript, much improved after two revisions constitutes a sound, if not groundbreaking, contribution to the field of permanent magnet materials. It can be most credited for the interest to the important but rarely addressed issue of mechanical properties.


Editor's comments:

1 In the section of the Keywords, it should be revised into "Keywords: Permanent magnets; Rapid-solidification, Quenching; Grain boundaries; Mechanical properties; Transmission electron microscopy". In each keyword, the first word should begin with a capital letter and the others should be in lower-case letters.

2 There still exist some minor grammatical, syntax or word usage errors in the manuscript. Please invite a native English speaker or language editing service to polish your submission again.

3 Numerous relevant papers have been published in the Journal of Alloys and Compounds ( J. Alloys Compd. ) and other Journals since 2008. Some key, important or/and latest research results should be mentioned and cited in the section of introduction instead of outdated or earlier papers so that we can  provide a solid background and progress to the readers regarding the current state-of-knowledge on this topic. Therefore, I strongly require you to rewrite this part and then update your citations, or it is very hard for me to accept your manuscript.

4 Any change or revision in the text should be highlighted by red color in the revised manuscript compared with that of previous version.
我觉得审稿人没什么具体的意见啊,不知道改怎么回复才好。而且编辑说的一些语法、句型和用词错误,早在头两次改的时候已经都改过了,是审稿人提出的错误。现在整篇文档都没有绿色的下划线,说明没有类似的错误应该。我现在不知道该怎么修改!请虫友们多给些意见,谢谢!

[ Last edited by ypp on 2009-10-10 at 21:25 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主


ypp(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-12 08:17
好好改,认真回复,应该是基本接受了。
10楼2009-10-10 22:51:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 34 个回答

yanmin7813

铜虫 (著名写手)


ypp(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-12 08:17
仔细按照编辑的修改.中的概率很大.
2楼2009-10-10 20:28:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljl8209

木虫 (知名作家)



ypp(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-12 08:17
还是要 response to reviewers 的
3楼2009-10-10 20:30:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hejicker

金虫 (著名写手)



ypp(金币+1,VIP+0): 10-12 08:17
是的    而且还要under review   时日漫长呀
4楼2009-10-10 20:37:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +6 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 10/500 2026-08-31 09:29 by huixian257
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +6 349506619 2026-08-28 6/300 2026-08-31 08:43 by kingkocxr
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +12 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 13/650 2026-08-29 00:04 by superceng
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +5 yuleib84 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 00:02 by yudaoqian88
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
信息提示
请填处理意见