24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3558)
>虫友互识 (499)
>文献求助 (405)
>导师招生 (291)
>硕博家园 (184)
>招聘信息布告栏 (178)
>博后之家 (128)
>休闲灌水 (120)
>论文投稿 (107)
>考博 (88)
>基金申请 (72)
>教师之家 (71)
>论文道贺祈福 (47)
>考研 (46)
>找工作 (45)
>金融投资 (44)

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

shifengyu

应助: (幼儿园)
在线:
虫号: 544991

[交流] 为何一篇SCI论文被两个期刊编辑分别直接拒稿?

我是个新手,写了一篇英文SCI文章, 两次直接被SCI期刊(IF>2)的编辑锯掉,非常郁闷. 文章似乎没有价值再修改投稿了? 被编辑贬得一文不值了。
请各位虫友给点建议.
第一次投稿后,被编辑锯掉:
第一次编辑回信:
Dear ** *,
Having gone through this paper I am of the opinion that it is a very minor extension of your earlier paper (**) that was recently accepted by this Journal. This paper merely considers sub-freezing conditions and slightly different storage periods. This is not adequately different and I am therefore rejecting the paper.
Please note that that our journal does not accept progress reports that attempt to generate multiple manuscripts on the same theme. The work must be novel with sufficient evidence of advancing the field of food engineering to justify further review.
I am sorry to disappoint you. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Yours sincerely,
** **
Editor Journal of **.

第二次编辑回信:
Dear ** *,
I regret to inform you that the content of your paper is not appropriate for publication in ***. The research reported in this paper is relevant and of interest to industry. The work was carried out in a competent fashion and is technically sound. However, the work is of limited general interest and is lacking in scientific depth and novelty to warrant publication in **. This decision is based on our editorial policy to publish more fundamental work of a general nature.
I understand that this decision may be frustrating since I know how long it takes to prepare a manuscript in a particular journal format. However, I invite you and members of your group to submit mechanistic papers with a strong quantitative emphasis for consideration for publication in**in the future.
Sincerely,
**
Editor in Chief **.

谢谢！

回复此楼