24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2743  |  回复: 29

梦想哲9505

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 大家帮忙看下MSEA还有希望吗,编辑给了个Reject and resubmit已有1人参与

两个审稿人给的意见很两极分化,编辑最后给的Reject and Resubmit                  
Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, the authors have systematically investigated xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. In general, the manuscript is very well written, and the results are of interest to steel community; therefore, I would like to suggest this effort for publication after some minor revisions.
三条意见还是比较好回答的
Reviewer #2: The present authors investigated the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. In conclusion, the reviewer could not recommend the submitted manuscript for publication, considering the scientific impact of the journal. The primary reason for this decision is a lack of novelty. Detailed comments are as followed.
扣的很仔细,16条意见,给的建议确实还行。属于工作程度很相似的同行,有些问题确实不太好回答,整个意见下来就没有对我工作的一句好话。。。。
Overall: The scientific novelty of the present study is weak. The purpose of the study was not clearly outlined nor were the findings of prior work properly discussed in the Introduction. In the Results and Discussion sections, the discussion was not sufficiently supported by the results to make scientific sense, nor did this work illustrate a new scientific advance. There is too much speculation; furthermore the English expression is not clear, understandable, and easy to interpret.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

明海天涯

新虫 (著名写手)

bobvan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
梦想哲9505: 金币+5, 有帮助 2021-08-03 22:19:45

匿名丶战华

铜虫 (正式写手)


lotuscsx: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2021-09-01 23:30:28

fxthouse

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

grayong

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

普通回帖

梦想哲9505

铜虫 (小有名气)

haibozhang

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


lotuscsx: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2021-09-01 23:30:35

匿名

专送一血

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


lotuscsx: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2021-09-01 23:30:44

KM小劢

禁虫 (正式写手)

梦想哲9505

铜虫 (小有名气)

相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 梦想哲9505 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见