| 查看: 1505 | 回复: 23 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
lcycomcn铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
千年虫
|
[交流]
审稿结果
|
||
|
4个月前投的一篇外文文章,共2个审稿人,前几天审稿意见回来,其中一个审稿人的意见是This is well written and contains scientically and technologically important results. I recommend "publish as is". 另外一个审稿人的意见是觉得没有引用2000年的一篇参考文献,还有和该文献的实验结果相差太大,给的意见是拒稿。最后编辑给的结果是拒稿。 其实我这篇文章和第2个审稿人说的参考文献所说的实验方法不一样,结果也不一样,我想给编辑写信争取一下,同时按照第2个人的审稿意见再好好改,不知道这样希望大不大?各位大侠有没有这样的给编辑写信的模板,麻烦发一份给我,重谢!邮箱:LCY82001@yahoo.com.cn |
» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有8人回复
最失望的一年
已经有17人回复
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有6人回复
求推荐博导
已经有4人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有34人回复
求助一下有机合成大神
已经有4人回复
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
26申博
已经有3人回复
基金委咋了?2026年的指南还没有出来?
已经有10人回复
疑惑?
已经有5人回复

18楼2009-08-29 15:13:48
精灵小睿
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 446.4
- 散金: 30
- 帖子: 156
- 在线: 17.6小时
- 虫号: 695103
- 注册: 2009-02-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信息系统与管理
★ ★
lcycomcn(金币+2,VIP+0):谢谢! 8-9 20:22
lcycomcn(金币+2,VIP+0):谢谢! 8-9 20:22
|
这个木虫里面应该有么 我与国外某审稿人的战争 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=652324&view=old We are thankful the reviewer for her/his comments on our manuscript. It is true that ××××and the ××× function are well described in literature, but it is for the ××× and ××× polymers. We have reviewed this fact in introduction in the original and revised manuscript. It is possible that the available open-source code software, such as ××× (i.e. a ××× theory), can treat the polymers with complex architecture. However, it should be mentioned that the advantage of our approach is that it not only can calculate the ××× of the polymers with complex architecture, but also minimizes the computational time-consumption. In other version algorithms, the ××× function for the polymers with complex architecture may be computed repeatedly. The more complex the architecture, the more the time-consumption of this repeated computation is, which leads to great waste of computer sources. Our algorithm overcomes this problem by computing the ××× function just in demands, i.e. every ××× function just needs to be computed one time, which greatly reduces the calculation of ××× in a minimum limit. Therefore, the proposed algorithm is a fairly efficient algorithm. In addition, it is also possible the ××× software can calculate the ×××of the polymers with complex architecture, but the ××××is still under developing, and the open-source code is not published yet for the polymers with complex architecture. Moreover, the ×××used the ×××, which is different from the ××××in this work. In the ××××××××××, while in the××××××. Furthermore, in the unpublished version of ××××, no any references or results about the ×××× for the polymers with complex architecture are available. In the available version of ××××, the software can only calculate the××××of the×××polymers, and even is not applicable to ××××polymers (×××××××××(web site)). Therefore, we believe that our algorithm is interesting and valuable. As a result, we request the referee to re-evaluate the value and importance of our algorithm. To highlight the importance of our algorithm, we added the following sentences into the revised version. “×××××××××××××××××××××" [ Last edited by 精灵小睿 on 2009-8-9 at 20:22 ] |
2楼2009-08-09 20:17:49
joymyself2006
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 283.8
- 散金: 642
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 754
- 在线: 69小时
- 虫号: 234668
- 注册: 2006-03-31
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能与智能高分子

3楼2009-08-09 20:18:50
zhaonan5571
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 123.2
- 散金: 2843
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1191
- 在线: 176.6小时
- 虫号: 588735
- 注册: 2008-08-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 通信理论与系统

4楼2009-08-09 20:22:26













回复此楼