| 查看: 2343 | 回复: 44 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
狂处士铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
稿件被拒，很郁闷，编辑的权力是不是太大了？？
|
||
|
本人投了一篇Environmental Monitoring And Assessment，审稿弄了五个多月，终于等到了意见，一个建议大修，一个建议直接接收，可是编辑直接给拒稿了，搞得我很郁闷。感觉编辑的权力是不是太大了啊？？大家有遇到这样的情况吗？各位虫虫给点意见，我该怎么办？？要不要写信给编辑部去申诉啊？？申诉的话有没有用啊？？还有编辑信中说修改后重投是客套话还是可行的啊？？ 以下是编辑的信和审稿人的意见。 Dear **********, We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript EMAS3999 "Organochlorine pesticides in the surface water and sediments of the Peacock River Drainage Basin in Xinjiang, China: a study of an arid zone in Central Asia". With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Below, please find the comments for your perusal.We urge you to consider carefully the comments and consider re-submitting this paper as a new submission. Please have your paper edited by an English language editor before re-submitting With kind regards, Journals Editorial Office Springer Comments for the Author: Reviewer #1: Manuscript Number: EMAS3999 Water and sediment samples were collected from Peacock River, Xinjiang Province, China and the concentrations of selected OCPs were measured and their possible sources were analyzed. These data are important since the information in the region is lacking, and may be interesting among scientist communities. I agree this paper to be published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment with a major revision. Reviewer #2: The manuscript presents a detailed study of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in water and sediment from a river in western China, where it is actually a prestine region. The has been little information about these toxic compounds in the area, and the presented data can be very useful in assessing the atmopsheric transport and deposition of OCPs to remote places. The samples were well collected with an excellent sampling strategy. The method was classic and with sufficient QA/QC measurements. The reported data was within the common ranges compared to other remote places in the world and China. The authors suggested that the OCPs in the region were all 'weathered' /aged ones, with source information provided. The manuscript was well written. I would suggest a derect publicition of it in EMAS. [ Last edited by 狂处士 on 2009-7-23 at 16:39 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有11人回复
-
救命帖
已经有5人回复
-
限项规定
已经有5人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复
-
招博士
已经有3人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有35人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
-
求推荐博导
已经有4人回复
-
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
ftbwang
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2536.1
- 散金: 200
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 110
- 在线: 42.5小时
- 虫号: 280742
- 注册: 2006-09-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
18楼2009-07-23 18:48:46
starcraft
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 663.1
- 散金: 35
- 帖子: 1146
- 在线: 85.5小时
- 虫号: 187191
- 注册: 2006-02-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学
2楼2009-07-23 15:45:42
狂处士
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 130 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.028
- 金币: 19431.9
- 散金: 1774
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 2845
- 在线: 500.1小时
- 虫号: 706357
- 注册: 2009-02-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 污染物行为过程及其环境效
3楼2009-07-23 15:48:44
4楼2009-07-23 15:49:13