24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

日不知夜黑

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 58.6
散金: 431
帖子: 167
在线: 56.6小时
虫号: 22525042
注册: 2020-06-01
专业: 粒子物理学和场论

[交流] iScience悲剧：not a bad news though!已有13人参与

如题。

审稿才2个星期多一点，真心快。虽然拒了，身经百战的老板却说应该庆祝一下：“that is not bad at all, actually this is what i am expecting. ”... "come on, xxxx, this is a cell press journal after all, not as easy as you think"

看了审稿意见，虽然提问较多，看得出审稿人还是很谨慎，没让我们做无厘头的实验。加上导师的鼓励，信心倍增！

由于是拒稿，就不发金币了。

dear xxxx,

thank you for submission of your paper to iscience. i have now included the comments that reviewers made on your paper, which i hope you will find useful and constructive. as you will see, the overall view is that the study is potentially interesting, but the recommendation is against publication of the paper in iscience and we have therefore closed the submission.

that said, the reviewers do make suggestions for further experiments and analyses that might guide the paper toward being a stronger candidate for the journal. if you are interested in pursuing further consideration of this work at iscience, you would first need to submit a point-by-point response that outlines how you might be able to address the reviewer concerns, and outlines how any corresponding results and/or edits would be incorporated into a revised manuscript. we would then assess the plan for revision, possibly in consultation with the reviewers. based on these considerations, we would either reactivate the manuscript file to enable resubmission, or reiterate our decision to reject the paper.

also, we recently updated our reviewer questionnaire to help reviewers and authors get the most out of the peer review process. we would appreciate your feedback. please visit the survey here.

i know that this outcome is disappointing, given the hard work that you and your colleagues have put into the paper. i hope that the reviewers' comments will be useful to you as you consider next steps, and i hope that you will consider iscience for future submissions as your interesting work progresses.

sincerely,

xxxxx

xxxx xxxxx, ph.d.
scientific editor, iscience

reviewers' comments
reviewer's responses to questions

....

经过近三个星期的苦战，终于取得新的实验数据完美回答审稿人的意见。牛鼻子老板信心满满，我们决定向iscience第二次冲击！

我向老板报告，iscience只有4.47分，人家根本不care：“it is a cell press journal; there is only one cell press in the world; impact factor is nothing under the name of cell” (最后一句话没听清楚，大概就是这个意思)

[ last edited by 日不知夜黑 on 2020-7-20 at 00:11 ]

老板又苦心修改了10天，重写了几大段，论文已经再投iscience，希望这次是个好结果！

该好好度个假了，去哪儿呢？florida的beach是去不成了，las vegas好像也不太平。国内很好玩可惜去不了，唉。。。

anyway, keep my fingers crossed!

[ last edited by 日不知夜黑 on 2020-7-30 at 13:57 ]

更新一下。论文7月29日重投后8月2日再次送审，应该是回到了以前的审稿人。希望好运

[ last edited by 日不知夜黑 on 2020-8-6 at 16:58 ]

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

小修！审稿半个月后返回，编辑给的是小修，非常开心！！！

审稿人还是以前的那些，又给了很多细节上的意见，大多对论文提升大有帮助。有一些意见改不改无所谓，但对大局无影响还是按照意见改了吧。可以看得出审稿人很谨慎，避免让我增加新的实验（因为考虑到我大手术一次了）。

等正式接收后，一定散金币祝福大家！

最后祝大家旗开得胜，马到成功！

[ Last edited by 日不知夜黑 on 2020-8-14 at 14:17 ]

回复此楼