| 查看: 1555 | 回复: 13 | ||||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
brisky1铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
submitted to Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
|
|||
|
郁闷！！ 差一点就中了！！！ Your paper submitted to Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics has now been refereed and the referee report(s) are attached. I am sorry to tell you that your paper is not suitable for publication in Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics in its current form. The changes needed are too great for a revision. However, the referee(s) feel that if you rewrite the article as explained in the referee reports, and include any further work recommended, it may then be suitable for reconsideration. If you wish to rewrite your paper, please take the referee comments fully into account, and provide a detailed response and a full list of changes. We will treat the rewritten paper as a new submission, with a new article reference number, and it will be peer reviewed again. Please note that although we will go back to the previous referees for their second opinion where this is possible, we may also contact further referees in order to ensure that the rewritten paper meets our high quality and interest criteria. If it does not do this, the new version will be rejected. I would like to thank you for your interest in Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. Yours sincerely Sarah Ryder & Stuart Roberts Publishing Administrators Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics Publishing Team Sarah Ryder & Stuart Roberts - Publishing Administrators Sarah Quin - Publisher Gregory Smith, Adam Zienkiewicz and Olivia Roche - Publishing Editors Martin Beavis - Production Editor Contact Details E-mail: jphysd@iop.org Fax: +44 (0) 117 9200664 FIRST REFEREE'S REPORT ============================ The paper contains very few actual results and only these keep me from recommending an outright rejection. If there were more results, possibly on more samples, and a more extensive analysis, the initial results presented here would be worthy of publication. Overall the article is poorly written and in some places very hard to understand. The authors should strongly consider improving their English for the sake of future articles. Article under review for Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics SECOND REFEREE'S REPORT ============================ This paper present an interesting approach to modify the 。。in the well known 。。, by the nanostructuring. The results seem to be plausible. Unfortunately it is impossible to evaluate the results since the description of magnetocaloric measuring apparatus is insufficient. This especially concerns the mass and shape of samples, uniformity of 。。。。. How was the sample temperature controlled ? How was the accuracy of temperature change measurement and the time sequence of measurements? The above questions are important because the measurements applied by the authors are not the standard ones. Moreover, the only Ref 24 given is not available. As the additional test for the applied measurements and interpretation, parameters of the 。。。。。 studied should be compared to the published data for the polycrystalline Gd. I hope to see a corrected version . Article under review for Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics ADJUDICATOR'S REPORT ============================ The authors report on the influence of nanostructuring on the 。。。 of 。。。. Although the subject is interesting, this referee considers that the work is not complete enough to be published in the present form in Journal of Physics D. In particular, the following points should be considered: -No details about the experimental setup are given. Taking into account that the reference provided is not easily accessible, and for the benefit of the readers, the main details of the experimental method should be given. -At the beginning of pg. 6 the authors seem to hint that they expected giant 。。。in the nanoparticles. Is there any reason for that? -Results indicate that 。。 is decreasing with decreasing grain size. Therefore, it seems that nanostructuring is deleterious for improving the 。。response of the material. However, there are two effects: grain size and consolidation by SPS. The starting nanoparticles are not measured, and that should give hints about the reason why 。。。is decreasing with grain size. When the sample is composed of small grains ， is the sample behaving as a set of coupled superparamagnetic particles? For this analysis, the isothermal magnetization curves could be helpful. -The labels of the size bars in the TEM micrographs should be enlarged. [ Last edited by nxssw on 2009-7-9 at 14:40 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 decision in progress |
» 猜你喜欢
请教限项目规定
已经有4人回复
-
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有8人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有26人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有7人回复
-
推荐一本书
已经有16人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有20人回复
-
26申博
已经有3人回复
-
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？
已经有10人回复
-
基金申报
已经有6人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
fangzhi2007
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 87 (初中生)
- 金币: 5758
- 散金: 1
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 792
- 在线: 642.7小时
- 虫号: 431174
- 注册: 2007-08-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 气体放电与放电等离子体技
7楼2009-07-07 13:00:56
haojigong
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3887.8
- 散金: 110
- 帖子: 560
- 在线: 29.3小时
- 虫号: 586824
- 注册: 2008-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
2楼2009-07-07 11:23:01
4楼2009-07-07 12:09:35
5楼2009-07-07 12:18:07