24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2196  |  回复: 12
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hzbchem

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] Major revision and reconsideration有希望吗?

投《Food Chemistry》三个审稿人,第一个基本是拒稿:Reading this manuscript a feeling is born that the authors sufficiently describe the pre-existing knowledge in the article rather than their findings of this work. Thus there are too many superfluous sentences in the manuscript.This work lacks originality. These facts weaken the merit of this paper.In summary, I think the presentation of this paper is not up to the standard of the journal. The manuscript contains grammar mistakes, so it should be proof read by an expert in English language before submitting again.

第二个审稿人 I think the manuscript is suitable for publicaction after including minor changes. So I suggest the publication of the paper in FOOD CHEMISTRY.

第三个审稿人This method provides a  valuable alternative for the  -----

编辑给的是Major revision and reconsideration,象这样有希望吗?请各位虫有介绍点经验,谢谢!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hzbchem

木虫 (正式写手)

谢谢各位,文章昨天已经接受了.
12楼2009-09-01 22:00:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答

haojigong

木虫 (正式写手)

希望大大的,好好修改
2楼2009-06-07 11:29:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

woshilaoer8381

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by hzbchem at 2009-6-7 11:25:
投《Food Chemistry》三个审稿人,第一个基本是拒稿:Reading this manuscript a feeling is born that the authors sufficiently describe the pre-existing knowledge in the article rather than their findin ...

我记得一个虫子说过这样的话,让你修改就是编辑已经站在你这一边!
3楼2009-06-07 11:36:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mywebtea

至尊木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
认真修改,会有希望的!
坚持每天领金币!
4楼2009-06-07 11:41:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见