24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者zhuziqing56将赠送您 3 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhuziqing56

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 8.6
帖子: 19
在线: 7.1小时
虫号: 5305095
注册: 2016-12-01

[求助] fuel 申诉已有3人参与

三个审稿人，两个意见还可以，另外一个不同。编辑给的拒稿，麻烦大神们看看，我想申诉一下，你们看可以吗？谢谢

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: Amendment
This paper addresses an interesting topic. It can deserve publication in Fuel. However, prior to publication, the authors should:

1) Extend the application of the theoretical equation to more fuels;
2) Reduce the number of tables (11 is a too large number);
3) Improve the English language throughout the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: Do not publish

Authors of this manuscript present analysis to estimate the lower and upper flammability limits of some hydrocarbons up to C4. They show improved predictions with the analysis but in a rambling fashion and with lots of tables. Manuscript is poorly written and low on data comparison. I noted many instances where great improvement is must. I provide following comments in the hope that the manuscript will be improved as suggested.

*    Why would it be necessary to take help from previous publications if the authors are confident that their results improve on previous ones? Considering that the manuscript has been cited for similarity with published sources, a line-by-line identification by the authors regarding the changes they have made after the test by CrossCheck is absolutely essential.
*    Authors state "...the group contribution method based on molecular structure. (The latter method) requires a large amount of experimental data measured at different temperature to build the model, which limits the use of the latter". This statement should have been qualified.
*    Why CAFT is introduced instead of Tad? Authors should remove CAFT and use Tad throughout as it is always a calculated quantity.
*    Use of "t" for temperature is discouraged. Use "T" instead.
*    Authors summarize on page 15, lines 45-48 that "this paper develops theoretical method to estimate the temperature dependence of flammability limits". What would they consider for introducing the pressure dependence in their analysis?
*    Authors do not offer any comments on including hydrogen. They should have declared at the onset why hydrogen is excluded and should have stated reasons for the same.
*    Figure 2 and 3 show not much data. Surely, the lower and upper flammability limits would have been determined in other studies. Is it possible to show more extensive comparison instead of only one reference?
*    Figure 4: The comparison has not been extended to higher hydrocarbons. Why?
*    Entries in column # 3 of Table 4 should be written appropriately with brackets. Avoid using (*) as a multiplication sign.
*    Too much data has been packed off into the tables. Much of the information contained in tables can be grouped into one table. For example,
      o    Combine Table 4 and 5
      o    Combine Table 6 and 10
      o    Combine Table 8 and 11

Reviewer #4: Amendment
The paper presents a method for the estimation of flammability limits of light hydrocarbons as a function of temperature. The authors propose a reformulation of the Burgess Wheeler relationship based on a more precise thermochemical analysis. The paper gives new insights and can be published. Few comments and questions are below. The authors should remove reference to a "kinetic" analysis or effect since no kinetic is actually used. English should be checked for an easier understanding in some places.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

参与限项已经有3人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求已经有7人回复
实验室接单子已经有4人回复
全日制（定向）博士已经有4人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化已经有3人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？已经有12人回复
不自信的我已经有12人回复
所感已经有4人回复
要不要辞职读博？已经有7人回复
北核录用已经有3人回复

1楼 2017-08-29 20:42:11

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhuziqing56

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 8.6
帖子: 19
在线: 7.1小时
虫号: 5305095
注册: 2016-12-01

As indicated in the reviewer's comments, one reviewer points out some concerns and does not agree the publication of your submission. Fuel policy is to publish the high quality paper. In view of the comments and recommendations made, I have decided that the manuscript cannot be accepted for publication.

编辑的原话