24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 21983  |  回复: 110

flylrh

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

很有启发,希望自己也能投中Angew。
101楼2009-02-13 11:46:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

WFFF

铜虫 (初入文坛)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

顶~~
102楼2009-02-13 11:57:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cenwanglai

荣誉版主 (知名作家)


有意思的原创也不简单,我经常觉得自己在搞原创,但是它不见得是有重要意义的原创,容易陷入自己个人思维的小圈子!
104楼2009-02-20 10:40:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

punkx

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

Referees should give reasons for their judgment of the importance in line with the following guidelines:

Based on our experience, we anticipate that: The top 5% of the submitted manuscripts are very important:

    * The results are highly innovative and of such significance as to attract the interest of the vast majority of the readers of Angewandte Chemie.
    * The results corroborate or lead to a new important theory or mechanism, or repudiate an established important theory or mechanism.
    * The scientific community has been waiting for such results for a long time.
    * When two referees rate the Communication as "very important" it is denoted as being a "very important paper" (VIP).

Approximately 20% of the submitted manuscripts are highly important:

    * The work is conceptually new.
    * The work is a very significant step forward for an important and/or wider field of research.

Another 20% of the submitted manuscripts are important:

    * The work is important for a wider field of chemistry, but is not suitable for Angewandte Chemie. It is more suitable for publication either as a Communication or—after expansion of the manuscript—as a Full Paper in journals such as Chemistry – A European Journal or Chemistry – An Asian Journal.

A third 20% of the submitted manuscripts are important but too specialized:

    * The work is of limited interest for a broad and heterogeneous readership.
    * The work is more suitable for journals catering for a more specific audience, such as one of Angewandte's sister journals: Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., Eur. J. Org. Chem., ChemBioChem, ChemPhysChem, ChemMedChem, ChemSusChem.

We also receive manuscripts that are less important and ill suited for Angewandte Chemie or its sister journals. Most of these are directly rejected by the editors.
105楼2009-03-03 20:40:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangyongjin

铜虫 (初入文坛)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

版主好漂亮
106楼2009-03-08 21:45:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

写的太好了,原来俺咋就没看到列?
107楼2009-10-30 21:07:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

napro

金虫 (正式写手)


帖子真精彩!
已经收录到淘贴专辑《化学科研精华
109楼2011-09-03 22:28:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

The-One

金虫 (正式写手)


★ 一星级,一般

你后面举得那两个例子,恐怕可以获诺贝尔奖了。
111楼2014-06-03 08:18:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
sunblog2008103楼
2009-02-15 10:43   回复  
 
shanglu108楼
2009-11-06 12:12   回复  
 
Quan.110楼
2014-06-03 05:40   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zhenmafudan 的主题更新
☆ 无星级 ★ 一星级 ★★★ 三星级 ★★★★★ 五星级
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见