| 查看: 1298 | 回复: 7 | ||
[求助]
激发态到基态的发射
|
|
基态的优化 %rwf=a1,40gb,a2,20gb %nosave %chk=test.chk %mem=50GB %nprocshared=12 # B3LYP/6-31g opt freq test 0 1 C -4.99604231 2.42576026 0.89163653 C -3.77272665 1.74536722 0.81574003 C -2.57764743 2.46357921 0.67153584 C -2.61058003 3.86291806 0.60361393 C -3.83217074 4.54456102 0.67929519 C -5.02586735 3.82531030 0.82342825 H -5.90754707 1.87626654 1.00170802 H -3.75123883 0.67685697 0.86793313 C -1.41616268 4.57021786 0.46001867 H -3.85353068 5.61307342 0.62709363 C -0.21757211 3.85901243 0.38791244 C -0.24291757 2.45957342 0.46109799 H -1.41928186 5.63885700 0.40616103 H 0.71205555 4.37724506 0.27778817 O -6.27402587 4.51885028 0.90090481 H -6.63455930 4.62844060 0.01795203 N -1.40844851 1.80552369 0.59939075 C 1.07447181 1.66591105 0.38245161 C 2.24907071 -0.61054051 0.38260734 C 1.05550396 0.31266719 0.45272466 C 0.28598441 -1.79031654 0.56289308 H 2.14635121 -2.65744111 0.12082288 N -0.12731702 -0.53782930 0.59360735 N 1.76360270 -1.94725293 0.71170046 O 3.43043970 -0.29057519 0.09010081 H 2.00477698 2.18292590 0.27232472 C -0.66986492 -2.98408102 0.38156897 H -1.62467554 -2.74326082 0.80018849 H -0.78099509 -3.19682871 -0.66116230 N -0.11784320 -4.16215039 1.06591141 H 0.77450315 -4.38721603 0.67467816 H -0.01398315 -3.96332077 2.04042661 基态到激发态的吸收 %rwf=a1,40gb,a2,20gb %nosave %chk=test.chk %mem=50GB %nprocshared=12 # B3LYP/6-31g TD=(NStates=10,50-50,root=1) test 0 1 C -3.870132 -1.931423 -0.032117 C -2.529672 -1.614431 -0.041301 C -2.107514 -0.256181 -0.009584 C -3.103707 0.780029 0.032094 C -4.475549 0.432299 0.040672 C -4.847013 -0.898697 0.009099 H -4.189039 -2.970404 -0.056376 H -1.759498 -2.375853 -0.072519 C -2.632355 2.123528 0.062830 H -5.242699 1.197683 0.071650 C -1.279985 2.370201 0.051860 C -0.348958 1.279390 0.009548 H -3.347852 2.939486 0.094562 H -0.902321 3.387013 0.074900 O -6.206741 -1.186114 0.019190 H -6.376253 -2.147133 -0.005894 N -0.766634 0.004669 -0.020244 C 1.070848 1.590424 -0.000063 C 3.549635 1.347203 -0.042967 C 2.155830 0.778575 -0.037011 C 3.520378 -0.920235 -0.112792 H 5.356075 0.149846 -0.067710 N 2.237791 -0.639094 -0.074020 N 4.349753 0.200074 -0.097443 O 3.934765 2.529401 -0.006321 H 1.313146 2.651980 0.025474 C 4.106204 -2.295786 -0.207862 H 3.386156 -2.997215 0.238200 H 4.186800 -2.563726 -1.269990 N 5.454320 -2.333168 0.364705 H 6.083995 -3.001680 -0.057694 H 5.492638 -2.353031 1.377015 激发态到基态的发射就错啦？没找到原因 %rwf=a1,40gb,a2,20gb %nosave %chk=test.chk %mem=50GB %nprocshared=12 # B3LYP/6-31g TD=(NStates=6,root=1) OPT test 0 1 C -3.870132 -1.931423 -0.032117 C -2.529672 -1.614431 -0.041301 C -2.107514 -0.256181 -0.009584 C -3.103707 0.780029 0.032094 C -4.475549 0.432299 0.040672 C -4.847013 -0.898697 0.009099 H -4.189039 -2.970404 -0.056376 H -1.759498 -2.375853 -0.072519 C -2.632355 2.123528 0.062830 H -5.242699 1.197683 0.071650 C -1.279985 2.370201 0.051860 C -0.348958 1.279390 0.009548 H -3.347852 2.939486 0.094562 H -0.902321 3.387013 0.074900 O -6.206741 -1.186114 0.019190 H -6.376253 -2.147133 -0.005894 N -0.766634 0.004669 -0.020244 C 1.070848 1.590424 -0.000063 C 3.549635 1.347203 -0.042967 C 2.155830 0.778575 -0.037011 C 3.520378 -0.920235 -0.112792 H 5.356075 0.149846 -0.067710 N 2.237791 -0.639094 -0.074020 N 4.349753 0.200074 -0.097443 O 3.934765 2.529401 -0.006321 H 1.313146 2.651980 0.025474 C 4.106204 -2.295786 -0.207862 H 3.386156 -2.997215 0.238200 H 4.186800 -2.563726 -1.269990 N 5.454320 -2.333168 0.364705 H 6.083995 -3.001680 -0.057694 H 5.492638 -2.353031 1.377015 Generating guess from densities on rwf. Convergence on wavefunction: 0.000001000000000 Iteration 1 Dimension 12 NMult 12 CISAX will form 12 AO SS matrices at one time. New state 1 was old state 4 New state 3 was old state 6 New state 4 was old state 5 New state 5 was old state 3 New state 6 was old state 1 Iteration 2 Dimension 24 NMult 24 New state 1 was old state 2 New state 2 was old state 1 No map to state 6 You need to solve for more vectors in order to follow this state. Error termination via Lnk1e in /data2/G09/g09/l914.exe at Tue Jul 12 11:18:45 2016. Job cpu time: 0 days 0 hours 31 minutes 12.9 seconds. File lengths (MBytes): RWF= 135 Int= 0 D2E= 0 Chk= 15 Scr= 1  3.png |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
超导转变温度NaN
已经有4人回复
-
华南师范大学先进光电子研究院电子纸团队诚聘2026级博士研究生
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有177人回复
-
QE利用声子计算的一系列lambda和Tc如何选
已经有8人回复
-
理论计算合作
已经有4人回复
-
小木虫的论文辅导靠谱吗？有没有用过的同学？
已经有1人回复
-
QE计算声子ph.out的Γ点出现虚频（-30cm-1）vasp计算没有
已经有0人回复
-
40-50万/年，中国散裂中子源诚聘计算模拟方向博士后
已经有81人回复
-
书籍求助：汽车市场营销理论与实务（电子版）——章小平
已经有0人回复
-
东方理-中科大联合博士生招聘
已经有0人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 【速成篇】常见仪器原理及其所提供信息
已经有31人回复
- 用高斯09计算手册中乙醛在乙醇溶液中的荧光光谱的问题
已经有12人回复
- 计算溶剂化效应时，如果用SMD模型，该怎么编写关键词呢
已经有4人回复
- 振动分辨的电子光谱的计算
已经有30人回复
- 关于芘测定临界胶束浓度
已经有3人回复
- 关于荧光激发发射光谱的一个问题
已经有9人回复
- 求荧光计算的完整例子
已经有7人回复
- 优化激发态的有关问题
已经有1人回复
- 测荧光，不同激发光，峰值为什么不同？
已经有7人回复
- 分析化学下册答案
已经有39人回复
- 各种仪器分析的基本原理及谱图表示方法 ——牛人总结，留着备用
已经有43人回复
- 请教基础知识：激发光谱和发射光谱呈镜像关系
已经有13人回复
- 如何计算金属络合物中的三重态到基态的光谱发射
已经有0人回复
- 磷光发射的计算
已经有1人回复
- 磷光材料dopant的发射光谱肩峰问题
已经有13人回复
- 磷光发射光谱中的肩峰讨论
已经有3人回复
- 图中S2，S1是怎么得到的？
已经有8人回复
- 【讨论】原子发射光谱法和原子荧光光谱法的区别是什么？
已经有10人回复
- 【求助】请教一个基础的，但困扰我很久的问题，关于原子吸收、发射和荧光
已经有4人回复
- 【其他】各种仪器分析的基本原理及谱图表示方法
已经有5人回复
- 【求助】如何计算在溶剂中的发射波长？
已经有5人回复
- 【求助】关于PL的一点疑惑
已经有4人回复
- 【求助】如何计算有机小分子的三重态能级（T1-S0）？
已经有12人回复
小范范1989
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 123 (高中生)
- 金币: 3821.3
- 散金: 968
- 红花: 243
- 帖子: 1979
- 在线: 452.8小时
- 虫号: 2013403
- 注册: 2012-09-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
|
优化激发态本来就很容易出错，首先你时出现you Need solve……这个问题你查查，有个帖子专门解决这个，我感觉，还是构型问题，同时机组有问题，不是之前说过？6-31g？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
byyd
2楼2016-07-13 15:53:35
3楼2016-07-14 16:34:14
4楼2016-09-01 12:40:29
5楼2016-09-01 12:42:08
小范范1989
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 123 (高中生)
- 金币: 3821.3
- 散金: 968
- 红花: 243
- 帖子: 1979
- 在线: 452.8小时
- 虫号: 2013403
- 注册: 2012-09-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
|
复制黏贴的 今日CCL上有人贴出了高斯优化激发态出现"No map to state x You need to solve for more vectors in order to follow this state."问题的官方技术支持的回复，值得一看。CCL上某人将步长减小后，的确解决了这一问题。 From: "Zhou Panwang pwzhou ~ gmail.com" owner-chemistry@ccl.net I have consulted this question with Gaussian Technique Support, and following are their answers. Please notice the last paragraph. Also, you can try use the last structure to restart the optimization or add the direct options to TDDFT. In the case of "No map to state **, you need to resolve more vectors" messages, this is usually an indication that one did not include enough excited states in the TD or CIS calculation. The "States=N" option to the "TD" or "CIS" keywords tells how many excited states to include in an excited state energy calculation. If this is not specified, the default value will be "States=3". The recommended value is to include a minimum of 2 or 3 more states than the state of interest. Thus, if you want to perform a geometry optimization for excited state 5, for example, I would recommend at least using "States=7" or "States=8". The geometry optimization will be done for one excited state M, selected with "Root=M", and one has to make sure that enough states are included in the CIS or TD expansion by having "States=N" where N is larger than M. It is possible that, at some point during an optimization of an excited state, the order of the excited states changes and the CIS or TD expansion might need to include more states in order to be able to follow correctly the state of interest. This is essentially what that message about including more vectors mean, that is that at that point, the number of states that you originally specified with "States=N" was not enough in order to solve for the state of interest, so a larger number "N" will need to be used for "States=N". Other times, the problem is that the ground state wavefunction becomes unstable, that is one of the states that was an excited at the initial geometry now becomes lower in energy than the state that was the ground state at the initial geometry. This kind of situation, unfortunately, cannot be modeled properly with single determinant expansions such as CIS or TD, and one would need to use CAS in order to be able to deal with the conical intersection or avoided crossing of states. Another thing to note is that one should be much more careful with geometry optimizations on excited states than for the ground state. Typically the energy differences among excited states are smaller than between the ground state and the first excited state. Thus, one can afford to perform larger geometry optimization steps when optimizing the ground state than in the case of optimizing an excited state. A "bad" geometry optimization step in the optimization of the ground state, may take you a bit off track but in following steps the optimization might find the way back and approach the converged structure. In the case of an optimization of an excited state, a "bad" geometry optimization step will also take you off track but, since other electronic states are close in energy, it is possible that at the new geometry the order of the excited states change and now the geometry optimization follows a different electronic state. This is not only a problem because the optimization could be pursuing a different state than the one you were interested in, but also because, if several of these changes occur during a geometry optimization, it may even be hopeless to continue with the optimization because the gradient information and the estimated hessian could be useless (since not all the previous points in the geometry optimization where points from the same potential energy surface). As a first measure to increase the reliability of the geometry optimization of excited states, I recommend to reduce the maximum allowed step size during geometry optimizations. Try "Opt=(MaxStep=10)" to set this value to 0.10 Bohr, or a smaller value if you still have problems. The default value is typically 0.30 Bohr. Reducing the maximum allowed step size will result in the geometry optimization taking more steps to reach convergence than with the default value. This will be true obviously for well-behaved geometry optimizations, but for problematic cases it will be the other way around, i.e. it will take fewer steps (and may even be impossible with the default step size) because it will be easier for the optimizer to follow a particular electronic state if the changes from step to step are not very drastic. |
6楼2016-09-01 17:42:16
7楼2016-09-07 10:43:53
小范范1989
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 123 (高中生)
- 金币: 3821.3
- 散金: 968
- 红花: 243
- 帖子: 1979
- 在线: 452.8小时
- 虫号: 2013403
- 注册: 2012-09-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
8楼2016-09-07 11:34:17