24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者溪风雨的 20 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

溪风雨

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1128.2
散金: 215
帖子: 320
在线: 38小时
虫号: 3746441
注册: 2015-03-17
性别: GG
专业: 机构学与机器人

[交流] mechanism and machine theory收到审稿意见之后不知所措

???????????????ó????????????????????Minor revision???ó???????????????????????????????à???ó????????????????????????????????????????°?????
?????????????????ó???????????é?????????????ù???ó?????????????????è????????????°????????????????????????????á??
?í????±à?????????????ó???????????????í??????????????????????

·???????????

Dear Dr. ###,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to https://ees.elsevier.com/mechmt/ and login as an Author. Please submit your revision by May 17, 2016

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

Mechanism and Machine Theory features the Interactive Plot Viewer, see: https://www.elsevier.com/interactiveplots. Interactive Plots provide easy access to the data behind plots. To include one with your article, please prepare a .csv file with your plot data and test it online at https://authortools.elsevier.com/interactiveplots/verification before submission as supplementary material.

Yours sincerely,

Paulo Flores, Ph.D
Editor in Chief
Mechanism and Machine Theory

Note: While submitting the revised manuscript, please double check the author names provided in the submission so that authorship related changes are made in the revision stage. If your manuscript is accepted, any authorship change will involve approval from co-authors and respective editor handling the submission and this may cause a significant delay in publishing your manuscript.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #2:
The authors investigate on the design and optimization of cam-linkage systems for gait rehabilitation. The manuscript is interesting and relevant for the readership of Mechanism and Machine Theory journal, being well organized and written in a satisfactory manner.

The method is based on the kinematics of motion, and considers as main parameters of design the cam variables and human gait parameters. The optimization is based on satisfying several constraints. The objective function minimizes size and optimizes operating parameters.

The manuscript can be accepted for publication after the following issues have been fully addressed:
1.
2.
3.
...
13.
...

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

最失望的一年已经有8人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗已经有27人回复
请教限项目规定已经有4人回复
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写已经有8人回复
推荐一本书已经有16人回复
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？已经有20人回复
26申博已经有3人回复
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？已经有10人回复
基金申报已经有6人回复
疑惑？已经有5人回复

1楼 2016-04-18 10:58:47

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

溪风雨

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1128.2
散金: 215
帖子: 320
在线: 38小时
虫号: 3746441
注册: 2015-03-17
性别: GG
专业: 机构学与机器人

引用回帖:

3脗楼: Originally posted by ggamis at 2016-04-18 11:15:42

脛茫潞脙露潞掳隆拢卢戮脥脤霉脕脣赂枚1,2,3,4. ..13 脛茫脠脙麓贸录脪脭玫脙麓赂酶脛茫脪芒录没隆拢隆拢

露卯露卯~~~脪虏虏禄脰陋碌脌赂脙虏禄赂脙脤霉拢卢拢卢拢卢

脠莽脧脗拢潞
1. Please clearly state the novelty and new contribution of the presented methodology when compared with those available in the thematic literature.

2. The literature review is short. Some relevant references in the filed are missing (see list of additional references listed below).

3. It is also recommended that the authors review the overall writing since several typing errors were noted in the manuscript.

4. Please remove the website link at subsection 3.1 and use appropriate reference.

5. Please revise the accuracy of lengths such us "Lthigh=398.4240 mm", the level of precision is to fine.

6. The design and optimization approach considers the gait trajectories given in Fig. 3. However, for most of the pathologies, different patterns must be considered. How are different patterns incorporated in the presented approach?

7. The objective function should be revised. In multiobjective optimization function, it is important to scale appropriately all contributions to the objective function. In equation (22), the authors are adding quantities with different dimensions. Note that results of optimization would change by changing units. Also, a discussion is needed about how to find appropriate weight factors for each term.

8. The optimized profile must be compared with other obtained profiles.

9. The method can be used for low speed applications, since only kinematics aspects are analyzed. High-speed applications need to consider induced vibrations in other components, such as springs, with implications also on the cam profiles. A comment is needed in this sense.

10. The authors may want to comment on the computational accuracy and efficiency of the proposed approach when compared with alternative cam design methodologies.

11. The validation, in terms of implementation and utilization for actual rehabilitation situations must be comments. In fact, doing this, it will be clear the benefits in comparison for alternative systems for gait rehabilitation.

12. Please clearly demonstrate the differences, benefits and merits of the proposed solution when compared with the one available in Ref. [8.]. See for instance, CAD model presented.

13. Please consider the following recommended references: ...