| 查看: 2954 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 溪风雨 的 20 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
溪风雨金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
mechanism and machine theory收到审稿意见之后不知所措
|
||
|
???????????????ó????????????????????Minor revision???ó???????????????????????????????à???ó????????????????????????????????????????°????? ?????????????????ó???????????é?????????????ù???ó?????????????????è????????????°????????????????????????????á?? ?í????±à?????????????ó???????????????í?????????????????????? ·??????????? Dear Dr. ###, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. To submit a revision, please go to https://ees.elsevier.com/mechmt/ and login as an Author. Please submit your revision by May 17, 2016 On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there. Mechanism and Machine Theory features the Interactive Plot Viewer, see: https://www.elsevier.com/interactiveplots. Interactive Plots provide easy access to the data behind plots. To include one with your article, please prepare a .csv file with your plot data and test it online at https://authortools.elsevier.com/interactiveplots/verification before submission as supplementary material. Yours sincerely, Paulo Flores, Ph.D Editor in Chief Mechanism and Machine Theory Note: While submitting the revised manuscript, please double check the author names provided in the submission so that authorship related changes are made in the revision stage. If your manuscript is accepted, any authorship change will involve approval from co-authors and respective editor handling the submission and this may cause a significant delay in publishing your manuscript. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #2: The authors investigate on the design and optimization of cam-linkage systems for gait rehabilitation. The manuscript is interesting and relevant for the readership of Mechanism and Machine Theory journal, being well organized and written in a satisfactory manner. The method is based on the kinematics of motion, and considers as main parameters of design the cam variables and human gait parameters. The optimization is based on satisfying several constraints. The objective function minimizes size and optimizes operating parameters. The manuscript can be accepted for publication after the following issues have been fully addressed: 1. 2. 3. ... 13. ... |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有74人回复
-
岩土工程学报什么时候才能终审完呐
已经有4人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有25人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有6人回复
-
快农历七夕节了，轻松一下，男人悄悄话，女施主请不要进来。
已经有3人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有9人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有26人回复
-
我的国基提前知道中了，可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了，怎么会有这样的人
已经有16人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有12人回复
-
招聘 金属平磨液，抛光液研发工程师
已经有3人回复
溪风雨
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1128.2
- 散金: 215
- 帖子: 320
- 在线: 38小时
- 虫号: 3746441
- 注册: 2015-03-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机构学与机器人
|
露卯露卯~~~脪虏虏禄脰陋碌脌赂脙虏禄赂脙脤霉拢卢拢卢拢卢  脠莽脧脗拢潞1. Please clearly state the novelty and new contribution of the presented methodology when compared with those available in the thematic literature. 2. The literature review is short. Some relevant references in the filed are missing (see list of additional references listed below). 3. It is also recommended that the authors review the overall writing since several typing errors were noted in the manuscript. 4. Please remove the website link at subsection 3.1 and use appropriate reference. 5. Please revise the accuracy of lengths such us "Lthigh=398.4240 mm", the level of precision is to fine. 6. The design and optimization approach considers the gait trajectories given in Fig. 3. However, for most of the pathologies, different patterns must be considered. How are different patterns incorporated in the presented approach? 7. The objective function should be revised. In multiobjective optimization function, it is important to scale appropriately all contributions to the objective function. In equation (22), the authors are adding quantities with different dimensions. Note that results of optimization would change by changing units. Also, a discussion is needed about how to find appropriate weight factors for each term. 8. The optimized profile must be compared with other obtained profiles. 9. The method can be used for low speed applications, since only kinematics aspects are analyzed. High-speed applications need to consider induced vibrations in other components, such as springs, with implications also on the cam profiles. A comment is needed in this sense. 10. The authors may want to comment on the computational accuracy and efficiency of the proposed approach when compared with alternative cam design methodologies. 11. The validation, in terms of implementation and utilization for actual rehabilitation situations must be comments. In fact, doing this, it will be clear the benefits in comparison for alternative systems for gait rehabilitation. 12. Please clearly demonstrate the differences, benefits and merits of the proposed solution when compared with the one available in Ref. [8.]. See for instance, CAD model presented. 13. Please consider the following recommended references: ... |
4楼2016-04-18 11:34:23
溪风雨
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1128.2
- 散金: 215
- 帖子: 320
- 在线: 38小时
- 虫号: 3746441
- 注册: 2015-03-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机构学与机器人
2楼2016-04-18 10:59:23
ggamis
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 63 (初中生)
- 金币: 27343.2
- 红花: 28
- 帖子: 3807
- 在线: 1032.6小时
- 虫号: 1776355
- 注册: 2012-04-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机械动力学
你好逗啊，就贴了个1,2,3,4. ..13 你让大家怎么给你意见。。 3楼2016-04-18 11:15:42
溪风雨
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1128.2
- 散金: 215
- 帖子: 320
- 在线: 38小时
- 虫号: 3746441
- 注册: 2015-03-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机构学与机器人
6楼2016-04-18 11:41:28
