| 查看: 6747 | 回复: 31 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Scientific Reports的审稿要求,5400个编辑，今年发文预计超2万 已有21人参与
|
|||
|
大家对此垃圾期刊警惕，现有编辑人数超过5400人，国内的近800人。身边很多博后是编辑。 https://www.nature.com/srep/about/editorial-board 2015年发表文章超过1万篇，2016年一月份发文接近2000篇，估计全年达到2.5万篇；影响因子泡沫会急速下降。这货就像是通货膨胀的一个奇葩。 接受了审稿邀请后，系统自动发来如下邮件： Dear Dr XXX, Thank you for agreeing to review the manuscript XXX. Papers published in Scientific Reports should be technically sound and scientifically valid. i.e. the methods must be appropriate and properly conducted, and the conclusions drawn must be fully supported by the data presented. Scientific Reports, unlike other journals published by Nature Publishing Group, does not assess papers based on perceived importance, significance or impact. Referees are not asked to make a judgement on the importance of the study - we ask the scientific community to make this judgement themselves post-publication. The review form will rapidly allow you to provide feedback in the following areas: - Is the paper technically sound? - Are the claims convincing? If not, what further evidence is needed? - Are the claims fully supported by the experimental data? - Are the claims appropriately discussed in the context of previous literature? - If the manuscript is unacceptable in its present form, does the study seem sufficiently promising that the authors should be encouraged to consider a resubmission in the future? In addition to answering the previous questions, you can provide further information as free-text, including comments that may answer the following: - Is the manuscript clearly written? If not, how could it be made more accessible? - Have the authors done themselves justice without overselling their claims? - Have they been fair in their treatment of previous literature? - Have they provided sufficient methodological detail that the experiments could be reproduced? - Is the statistical analysis of the data sound? - Are there any special ethical concerns arising from the use of animals or human subjects? To access the manuscript, review form, and instructions please click on the link below. ... |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问共同通讯和共同一作的认可度问题
已经有4人回复
-
286分调剂
已经有22人回复
-
材料调剂
已经有4人回复
-
085600 295分求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
材料调剂
已经有4人回复
-
302求调剂一志愿华中师范大学
已经有3人回复
-
环境285分，过六级，求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
08工科求调剂290分
已经有8人回复
-
321求调剂 一志愿 浙江工业大学生物医药
已经有4人回复
-
266分，一志愿电气工程，本科材料，求材料专业调剂
已经有4人回复
garrisongao
版主 (著名写手)
- 应助: 659 (博士)
- 贵宾: 0.522
- 金币: 9077.8
- 散金: 6276
- 红花: 75
- 沙发: 13
- 帖子: 2823
- 在线: 1425.8小时
- 虫号: 1471645
- 注册: 2011-11-01
- 专业: 信息安全
- 管辖: 公派出国
28楼2016-03-05 08:44:27
marineman
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
爱八卦爱生活
- 应助: 486 (硕士)
- 金币: 26035.4
- 散金: 7934
- 红花: 36
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 7783
- 在线: 279.7小时
- 虫号: 255556
- 注册: 2006-05-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 等离子体物理
2楼2016-03-03 07:23:25
3楼2016-03-03 07:58:18
hqzhou0817
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 164 (高中生)
- 金币: 496.7
- 散金: 1940
- 红花: 14
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 2211
- 在线: 466小时
- 虫号: 941323
- 注册: 2010-01-12
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
4楼2016-03-03 08:00:48
