24小时热门版块排行榜 |
该期刊扩展资料,欢迎小木虫资深虫友来补充。一起完善,供大家参考。为了保证质量,目前只有金币大于50个的虫子可以参与期刊点评。 |
SCI期刊名: |
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INDIAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
T INDIAN CERAM SOC
|
我要投此期刊 |
出版周期: | Quarterly | |
出版ISSN: | 0371-750X | |
通讯方式: | INDIAN CERAMIC SOC, CENTRAL GLASS & CERAMIC RES INST, KOLKATA, INDIA, 700 032 | |
期刊主页网址: | http://www.transactions-incers.org/index.php | |
在线投稿网址: | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tcer | |
其他相关链接: |
Science Citation Index Expanded |
偏重的研究方向: | 工程与材料(4) 无机非金属材料(3) 无机非金属类光电信息与功能材料(1) 金属材料(1) 金属非晶态、准晶和纳米晶材料(1) 凝聚态物性 II :电子结构、电学、磁学和光学性质(1) 物理学I(1) 数理科学(1) 结构陶瓷(1) 功能陶瓷(1) |
投稿录用比例: | 80% (计算公式:参与点评网友投稿录用人数/总点评网友人数×100%) |
审稿速度: | 平均 2.33333 个月的审稿周期(非官方数据) |
审稿费用: | -(非官方数据) |
版面费用: | -(非官方数据) |
速度还行,中过一篇,但是出版实在是太慢了。这都N个月了,依然没动静。 |
研究方向: 工程与材料 无机非金属材料 功能陶瓷 投稿周期: 约3个月 录用情况: 已投修改后录用 |
18-Jan-2015投的,按19号的意见修改后,26号重投,之后由于放假,寒假,没注意,返校后,3月7号查看,under review,3月18返回意见,拘稿,整体速度还行意见很详细,只是有好些问题难以理解. 19-Jan-2015 Dear Professor Wan-Chang Sun: Your above referenced manuscript, entitled "Effects of Sintering Process and Y2O3 on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of TiCN-Based Cermets" requires some further changes before it is ready for reviewing in Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society. Your submission has been returned to you and is located in your Author Center as a draft, so that you can make the required changes to it and submit it again. Comments from the Editorial Office after initial scrutiny are provided at the end of this e-mail. Your submission along with all files you submitted is now in your Author Center, at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tcer Please read the Quick Guide to Continuing your Submission, which shows how you can access your manuscript, and submit it back to the site. The Guide is located at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/societyimages/tandf_qs0/Conti nuning%20a%20Submission_screenshot.pdf Your manuscript must be set out in our journal’s style before we will review it. Please revise it in line with our style, and submit an improved manuscript. See the Instructions for Authors for details, which can be reached via the “Instructions & Forms” link at the top right of this page. You may contact the Editorial Office if you have further questions. Sincerely, Dr S. K. Bhadra Hony Editor Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society skbhadra@cgcri.res.in Comments from the Editorial Office: 1. There are a number of boxes throughout the whole manuscript, which should be replaced by appropriate characters. 2. Insertion places of tables and figures should not be mentioned in the manuscript. 18-Mar-2015 Dear Professor Sun: I regret to inform you that our reviewers have now considered your paper but unfortunately feel it unsuitable for publication in Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society. For your information I attach the reviewer comments at the bottom of this email. I hope you will find them to be constructive and helpful. You are of course now free to submit the paper elsewhere should you choose to do so. Thank you for considering Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Dr S. K. Bhadra Hony Editor Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society skbhadra@cgcri.res.in Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The choice of the composition needs to be elaborated. There are gross deviations among the text, table and figure: Intro. p5 and Table 1; p6 (sl no. 9 t0 14) and Fig.I. Fig. 4 may be omitted as it does not convey an important conclusion. Why theoretical density values are changed for calculating the relative densities of specimens 1# and 5# only (Table 2)? Language correction is needed. The paper is written in a hurried and negligent manner and a number of mistakes have been committed (between the text, the table and figures). Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This paper has the following drawbacks. 1. The table 1 indicates that the total content of Ti, Ni, Co, C, Cr3C2, Mo and W is maintained as 50 wt % and TiC & Y2O3 as 50 wt %. The authors have nowhere mentioned how they have arrived at this composition. What is the role of these materials in sintering/physical properties ? Has this composition any scientific meaning ? or taken as a random choice ? 2. The melting point of Ni is 1455 oC and Co is 1495 oC. This necessarily leads to liquid phase sintering. What is the role of Mo (melting pt. 2610 oC and W ( m. pt. 3410 oC) ? This has not been explained in the text. 3. Table 2 column 4 (type of porosity) what does the abbreviation mean ? 4. The sintering process has been carried out in 7 step heating. What is the effect of such step heating over uniform heating rate ? Is there ant special advantage ? 5. The equations 1 to 5 do not mention the energy of formation. Are these equations thermodynamically feasible ? Equations 2 to 5 indicate suffix x and y. What are the values of x and y ?. Are they constant or variable ? 6. What does (Cr,W,Mo,Ti)(C,N) mean ?. Is it a structurally a stable compound ? 7. Sample 1# and 5# are having same composition. The sintering temperature of 1# is 1450 oC and 5# is 1500 oC. The density of sample 1# sintered at 1450 oC of 5.45 g/cc has relative density of 89.6 % of TD where as sample 5 # sintered at 1500 oC of density of 5.53 g/cc has relative density of 88.5 % of T.D. How is it possible ?. This applies to all other compositions. This paper has not thrown any new scientific information. Hence this paper is recommended for rejection. |
研究方向: 工程与材料 无机非金属材料 结构陶瓷 投稿周期: 约3个月 录用情况: 已投被拒 |
我是第一次在这个期刊上投稿,效率还行,3个月给初审结果,大修,修改稿提交后,一个月给最终结果。虽然影响因子不高,但是评审专家意见中肯,能够学到很多东西,只要你好好仔细修改,就有可能被接收。 |
研究方向: 工程与材料 无机非金属材料 无机非金属类光电信息与功能材料 投稿周期: 约3个月 录用情况: 已投修改后录用 |
一篇自己觉得还可以的文章,被其他SCI拒稿后改投该杂志。 投过去,给了比较中肯的意见,大修后接收了,有些欣慰。 审稿速度比我想象的快。 此杂志在国内好像没多大知名度。 |
研究方向: 工程与材料 金属材料 金属非晶态、准晶和纳米晶材料 投稿周期: 约1个月 录用情况: 已投修改后录用 |
这种档次的文章感觉不是很慢,两个月的审稿还能接受。两个审稿人,审稿比较专业,能学到东西。不像有的审稿人根本没提出好的建议,一味的让你补数据。一审回来大修,认真的修回去后接受。这篇文章数据不好,但不发又觉得浪费,所以投了。但学到了很多东西,个人觉得没有白投。 |
研究方向: 数理科学 物理学I 凝聚态物性 II :电子结构、电学、磁学和光学性质 投稿周期: 约1个月 录用情况: 已投修改后录用 |